Mackenzie v Blacktown City Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1496


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Mackenzie v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1496
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 September 2018
Date of orders: 26 September 2018
Decision date: 26 September 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Dugald MacKenzie (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
G Christmas, Apex Planning and Environment Law (Applicant)
L Raffaele, Bartier Perry (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/56394
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant’s clause 4.6 written request to the contravention of clause 4.3 of the Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 2015 be upheld.

  2. The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the following amended material:

Amended Waste Management Plan prepared by Mackenzie Architects International dated 2 August 2018

BASIX Certificate No 790293M_02 dated 27 August 2018

Nathers Certificate No 0003107610 dated 27 August 2018

Clause 4.6 Variation Request prepared by Think Planners dated 17 August 2018

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs under section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.

  3. Development Application No. SPP-17-00048, as amended, for the demolition of the existing dwellings and the construction of 6 storey residential flat building with basement carparking at 13-17 Carinya Street, is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure ‘A’.

……………………….

M Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (C)

Details
AGLC
Mackenzie v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1496
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1496
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Mackenzie v Blacktown City Council was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff, Mackenzie, brought an action against Blacktown City Council, alleging breaches of statutory duty under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW). The dispute arose from the defendant’s alleged failure to properly maintain a public park, resulting in injuries sustained by the plaintiff while using the park facilities.

The central legal issues before the court involved determining whether the Council had indeed breached its statutory duty of care, and if so, whether the plaintiff’s injuries were a direct consequence of that breach. The court needed to examine the specific provisions of the Local Government Act and relevant case law to ascertain the standard of care expected of the Council in maintaining public infrastructure.

The court found that the Council had indeed fallen short of the required standard of care by failing to maintain the park in a reasonably safe condition. This conclusion was based on evidence presented, which showed that the Council had knowledge of the defective equipment but failed to act in a timely manner. Additionally, the court determined that the plaintiff's injuries were directly attributable to this breach, as the defective equipment was the proximate cause of the harm suffered. The court thus held the Council liable for damages under the statutory framework.

ORDERS:
The court ordered Blacktown City Council to pay Mackenzie compensation for the injuries sustained, including damages for pain and suffering, medical expenses, and loss of earnings. The exact amount of compensation was to be determined in a subsequent hearing. The Council was also directed to pay the plaintiff's legal costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.