MACIK & JANSON
Case
•
[2020] FamCA 743
•7 September 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
MACIK & JANSON [2020] FamCA 743
[2020] FamCA 743
7 September 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of MACIK & JANSON, Hannam J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered a dispute concerning the parenting arrangements for three children. The proceedings involved applications by both the mother and the father regarding the children's residence and the father's contact with them.
The court was required to determine the appropriate parenting orders, specifically addressing issues of parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements, and the nature and extent of the father's time with one of the children. A key consideration was the need for supervised contact between the father and the child Y, and the arrangements for such supervision.
Hannam J made orders reflecting a determination of the children's best interests. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility for child X, and children X and Y were ordered to live with the mother. Child Y was to spend time with the father for a minimum of three hours per fortnight, with this contact to be supervised by a service agreed upon by the parties or nominated by the Independent Children's Lawyer if agreement could not be reached. The father was to bear the costs of this supervision. The previous order restraining the father from attending within 50 metres of the children's residence was discharged.
The court was required to determine the appropriate parenting orders, specifically addressing issues of parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements, and the nature and extent of the father's time with one of the children. A key consideration was the need for supervised contact between the father and the child Y, and the arrangements for such supervision.
Hannam J made orders reflecting a determination of the children's best interests. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility for child X, and children X and Y were ordered to live with the mother. Child Y was to spend time with the father for a minimum of three hours per fortnight, with this contact to be supervised by a service agreed upon by the parties or nominated by the Independent Children's Lawyer if agreement could not be reached. The father was to bear the costs of this supervision. The previous order restraining the father from attending within 50 metres of the children's residence was discharged.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Injunction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
MACIK & JANSON [2020] FamCA 743
Most Recent Citation
Macik & Janson [2023] FedCFamC1F 143
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
1
SS & AH
[2010] FamCAFC 13
George & George
[2013] FamCAFC 182
Deiter & Deiter
[2011] FamCAFC 82