MacFarlane, David James v John Martin & Company Ltd

Case

[1977] FCA 47

10 Aug 1977

No judgment structure available for this case.

:

I

l

f a c t 0: c ra t e

on

t h e mind

of

the

p x s o n i jhos? pu rchase l ed t o

tl;c

p r o s r c u t l o n .

T h e

dcfcnda11t

did

rLot

dcl;!Jt-rately

1nCcn2 to 661c<=i\,r-.

t h e p u b l x ; b u t

it

had

Sccn

put

on

not jce

t h a t t h e

s tca te~+~: t

..

corr,plained

of

a t least

might be parCiai1.y untrul=

ancl

I I C ~ . ~ C ~ ~ - I ~ ~ ~ . C S ~

I

t o o k n o s t e p s , o r a t

a n y r a t c i n s u f € l c i m t s t e p s , t o

ch?ck

ii-s

accuracy.

I am not

impressed

by

t h c f a c t

t h a t

the dcfcndzgt

m?.g

at any time

have

on

hand

s3me 300,000 i t ens of c tock :

Its €21.5~

a d v c r t i s e m e n t r e l a t e d o n l y t o t h i s

one

i t c m

alicl

it

was

t o

i t s

s t a t e m e n t s

a b c u t

t h a t

item

t h a t

i t s

c a r c

and

at tent lcy~i

shoulc!

ll:lvc.

been

d i r e c t e d .

Its c o n t r a v e n t i o n of

S.

5 3 ( a j waz

caused

by

c a r c l c s s n e s s ,

b u t c o n t r a v e n t i o n s

c lue

t o

c a r c l e s s n c s s

a r e

n o t

permissiLle

and

mus t

be

pun i shed ,

t hmqh t hey

o r e , lot

of

t h e

sc>r,>z

order

of

c u l p a b i l i t y a s

those

involving

an

i l>tcnt ;or .

i o A2cc11172:

Mctzcla C a w , p-.r Smitlwrs J.

-___

The>

only

appearance

of

1 . h ~ aclvc.rt i~ement W?;

in

' ' l ' ? ! ~

Adve r t i s e r "

o f

2 3 Octobcr

1 9 7 5 ,

and

it

spoke

e f f c c t i v c l l - 01,1;7

once,

and

o n l y

t o

those who c o u l d

, I t t e n d

a t

om? cf the

:2<:f~:~1:l<>I'l

:

A .

.

pecun ia ry

pena l ty

is

a

f l n e

o f

$ 2 , 0 0 0 .

I

o r d c r

; ~ c c c ~ ? . ~ i i ~ : q l y ,

;l5

i n a d d i t i o n o r d e r t h c d e f e n d a n t t o

pay

the i r , for r :x l t '

S

costs ,

which

i f n o t a g r e e d

are

to

be taxed .

I n f a i r n e s s t o J u l i u s

Mdrlsw

Pty

L l m l t , v 3 ,

t11c ,na~~u?'.;i.tur<

of

t h c a d v e r t i s e d

shocs,

and

i t s sub: , idlar ies

cGxccrflec1 i n t l w

r c l evan t

t r ansac t ion : ,

'I

should add

t h L : t

n o t h i r : ~ i n

t h l s cr17c

r e f l e c t s I n the

s l i g h t c s t d c g r c c

ori

t h e commrcizti

integrity

c)?

any of thosc

companies.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0