FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| MACDUFF & SEAWARD | [2014] FCCA 1012 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting – urgent application by mother for passport orders and permission for children to travel overseas – father opposes application – long history of litigation between the parties – final parenting orders provide for mother to have sole parental responsibility and for the children to spend supervised time with the father – whether costs order should be made. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975, ss.60CA, 60B, 60CC, 62B, 64B, 65DA(2), 65(1), 65X, 65Y, 65Z, 117 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.21.02 |
| Goode & Goode (2006) FLC 93-286 Kuebler & Kuebler (1978) FLC 90-434 Line & Line (1996) 21 Fam LR 259; (1997) FLC 92-729 Rice & Asplund (1978) 6 Fam LR 570 at 572; (1979) FLC 90-725 Seaward & MacDuff [2011] FMCAfam 986 Seaward & MacDuff [2013] FamCA 485 |
| Applicant: | MS MACDUFF |
| Respondent: | MR SEAWARD |
| File Number: | SYC 2177 of 2011 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Monahan |
| Hearing date: | 15 May 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 15 May 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 21 May 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Not Applicable |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Self-represented Litigant |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Not Applicable |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Self-represented Litigant |
ORDERS
MS MACDUFF (”the mother”) be allowed to travel to (country omitted), (country omitted) with:
(a)X born (omitted);
(b)Y born (omitted); and
(c)Z born (omitted)
(“the children”), for the period between 23 June 2014 until 13 July 2014, inclusive (“the holiday period”).
The mother cause the children to be seen by a general practitioner prior to the holiday period for an assessment by that general practitioner as to the children’s fitness to undertake travel by air to and from (country omitted).
For the duration of the holiday period the mother is to ensure that:
(a)the children reside overnight in hotel accommodation;
(b)the children do not travel to the areas of (country omitted), (country omitted) and the (country omitted) provinces; and
(c)she has obtained appropriate travel insurance for herself and the children.
Paragraph 5 of the Orders made 15 May 2014 be discharged.
There be no order as to costs however the mother have liberty to re-agitate the issue of the costs of these proceedings in any further proceedings between the parties.
All extant applications be otherwise dismissed.
THE COURT NOTES THAT:
(A)Orders were made on 15 May 2014 which provided for the Applicant to obtain passports for the children without the consent of the Respondent.
(B)Pursuant to ss.65DA(2) and 62B of the Family Law Act 1975 (“the Act”), the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders are set out in Annexure A and those particulars are included in these orders.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym MacDuff…
Continue reading MacDuff and Seaward
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- MacDuff and Seaward [2014] FCCA 1012
- Case
- [2014] FCCA 1012
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the mother's request for international travel with the children, and if so, what conditions should be imposed to safeguard their welfare and ensure their return. This involved assessing the appropriateness of the travel arrangements in light of the children's best interests.
The court ordered that the mother be permitted to travel with the children between 23 June 2014 and 13 July 2014. This permission was subject to several conditions designed to ensure the children's safety and well-being during the trip. These included a requirement for a general practitioner to assess the children's fitness for air travel, the mother to secure appropriate travel insurance, and restrictions on the children's overnight accommodation and travel to specific regions within the destination country. The court also discharged a previous order made on 15 May 2014 concerning the children's passports.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
MS MACDUFF (”the mother”) be allowed to travel to (country omitted), (country omitted) with:
(a) X born (omitted);
(b) Y born (omitted); and
(c) Z born (omitted)
(“the children”), for the period between 23 June 2014 until 13 July 2014, inclusive (“the holiday period”).
2.
The mother cause the children to be seen by a general practitioner prior to the holiday period for an assessment by that general practitioner as to the children’s fitness to undertake travel by air to and from (country omitted).
3.
For the duration of the holiday period the mother is to ensure that:
(a) the children reside overnight in hotel accommodation;
(b) the children do not travel to the areas of (country omitted), (country omitted) and the (country omitted) provinces; and
(c) she has obtained appropriate travel insurance for herself and the children.
4.
Paragraph 5 of the Orders made 15 May 2014 be discharged.
5.
There be no order as to costs however the mother have liberty to re-agitate the issue of the costs of these proceedings in any further proceedings between the parties.
6.
All extant applications be otherwise dismissed.
THE COURT NOTES THAT:
(A) Orders were made on 15 May 2014 which provided for the Applicant to obtain passports for the children without the consent of the Respondent.
(B) Pursuant to ss.65DA(2) and 62B of the Family Law Act 1975 (“the Act”), the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders are set out in Annexure A and those particulars are included in these orders.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.