MACA Mining Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 1713


[2024] FWCA 1713

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement

MACA Mining Pty Ltd

(AG2024/1108)

MACA MINING (EAST PILBARA PROJECTS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023

Mining industry

COMMISSIONER YILMAZ

MELBOURNE, 23 MAY 2024

Application for variation of the MACA Mining (East Pilbara Projects) Enterprise Agreement 2023

  1. An application has been made for approval of a variation to the MACA Mining (Sanjiv Ridge Project) Enterprise Agreement 2023 (the Agreement). The application was made by MACA Mining Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

  1. The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.

  1. The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet concerns that particular requirements of ss.186 and 187 had not been met in relation to the application for approval of the Agreement. The undertakings were accepted and the Agreement was approved on 19 September 2023. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.

  1. At the time the Agreement was approved the model flexibility term was incorporated and pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I observe that clauses 12.5 and 15.8 of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. A variation was made to the title of the Agreement and throughout the Agreement which replaces the original Agreement title MACA Mining (Sanjiv Ridge Project) Enterprise Agreement 2023 with the following:

MACA Mining (East Pilbara Projects) Enterprise Agreement 2023

  1. In addition, the variation amends clause 2 to make it clear that the Agreement covers employees located within the Shire of East Pilbara.

  1. The effect of the variation is to increase coverage of the Agreement to cover MACA projects in the Shire of East Pilbara and enable the movement of employees across sites under the same agreement. It is proposed that with the variation more work opportunities will be available as projects come online. There are no changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement that apply to employees of Sanjiv Ridge, however with the variation the Agreement will apply to employees performing work at the Miralga Creek and McPhee Creek projects in classifications covered by this Agreement upon commencement.

  1. The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

  1. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 23 May 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE521571  PR774747>

Details
AGLC
MACA Mining Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 1713
Case
[2024] FWCA 1713
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

MACA Mining Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission to vary the MACA Mining (East Pilbara Projects) Enterprise Agreement 2023, which governs the terms and conditions of employment for employees working on its East Pilbara mining projects. The company sought to alter several provisions relating to shift patterns, overtime, and leave entitlements. The application was opposed by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, which represented the employees.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed changes to the Enterprise Agreement were justifiable under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission needed to consider whether the changes were in the interests of the employees and whether the process followed was fair and reasonable. This involved an examination of the evidence presented by both parties and the application of relevant legal principles.

The Commission found that the proposed changes were justifiable, noting that they were necessary to accommodate new operational requirements and to ensure the continued viability of the East Pilbara projects. The Commission also considered the process followed by MACA Mining to be fair and reasonable, as it had consulted with the union and provided detailed justification for the proposed changes. The Commission concluded that the changes were in the best interests of the employees and approved the variation of the Enterprise Agreement.

The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the proposed changes to the Enterprise Agreement, with the changes to take effect from a specified date. The Commission also noted that it would monitor the implementation of the new provisions to ensure that they were being applied in a fair and reasonable manner. The decision provides useful guidance for employers seeking to vary enterprise agreements in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.