[2014] FWCA 242 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
M&P Services (Qld) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/12084)
M&P SERVICES (QLD) PTY LTD ADMIN/SALARY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Clerical industry | |
COMMISSIONER CARGILL | SYDNEY, 10 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the M&P Services (Qld) Pty Ltd Admin/Salary Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the M&P Services (Qld) Pty Ltd Admin/Salary Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by M&P Services (Qld) Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The company has provided a written undertaking in relation to redundancy provisions in the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied the undertaking meets any concern I have in relation to the Agreement. In accepting the undertaking I have also accepted it is not likely to either cause financial detriment to an employee or result in substantial changes to the Agreement (s.190(3)). I note that under s.191 of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to the Agreement.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 17 January 2014. The nominal expiry date is four years from the date of approval.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE406314 PR546658>
- AGLC
- M&P Services (Qld) Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 242
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 242
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission needed to address were whether the agreement met the formal requirements of the Fair Work Act, including whether it was properly certified as a Simple Green Fields Agreement, and whether it contained terms that were not unfair to the employees. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement was consistent with the objects of the Act, particularly in terms of ensuring that employees were treated fairly and had adequate protections.
After examining the agreement and the evidence provided, the Commission determined that the agreement met the formal requirements of the Act. The Commission found that the agreement was fairly and reasonably negotiated and that it did not contain any terms that were unfair to the employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement was consistent with the objects of the Act and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees.
The Commission's final order was that the Admin/Salary Enterprise Agreement 2013 be approved as a registered agreement under section 173 of the Fair Work Act. This meant that the agreement would be legally binding on the parties and enforceable by the Fair Work Commission. The approval of the agreement meant that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement would apply to the employees covered by it, and the agreement would remain in effect until it was varied or terminated in accordance with the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.