| [2015] FWCA 518 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
M.B. Pre-Fab Framing Pty Ltd
(AG2014/10303)
MB PREFAB PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Timber and paper products industry | |
COMMISSIONER BLAIR | MELBOURNE, 20 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the MB Prefab Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the MB Prefab Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by M.B. Pre-Fab Framing Pty Ltd.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 January 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 November 2015.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE412329 PR560273>
- AGLC
- M.B. Pre-Fab Framing Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 518
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 518
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the enterprise agreement provided adequate terms and conditions for the employees and whether it adhered to the statutory requirements for a low-paid enterprise agreement. The court had to assess the agreement's provisions concerning minimum wages, penalty rates, and other conditions of employment to determine if they met the statutory standards. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether the necessary consultation processes were followed.
The Fair Work Commission concluded that the enterprise agreement met the necessary statutory requirements for a low-paid enterprise agreement. The court found that the agreement provided appropriate terms and conditions for employees, including fair wages and reasonable working hours, which aligned with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also determined that the agreement was made in good faith and that the consultation processes were adequately followed. Therefore, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was granted, and it was registered under the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.