M and R Civil Pty Limited v Hornsby Council

Case [2003] NSWLEC 14


>

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: M & R Civil Pty Limited v Hornsby Council [2003] NSWLEC 14
PARTIES:

APPLICANT:
M & R Civil Pty Limited

RESPONDENT:
Hornsby Council
FILE NUMBER(S): (4)0466 of 2002
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- Duty of Council to make available to public copies of its business papers-correlative right of Applicant
as member of public
to inspect free of charge
agenda and business papers to be considered at Council Meeting
LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 07/08/02
EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :

08/07/2002
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT:
Mr D Miller, Barrister
SOLICITORS
Maddocks

RESPONDENT:
Mr T Pickup, Solicitor
SOLICITORS
Solicitor for Hornsby Council


JUDGMENT:


IN THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES

Matter No . . (4)0466 of 2002


Coram : Bignold J


7 August 2002

M AND R CIVIL PTY LIMITED

Applicant

v

HORNSBY COUNCIL

Respondent

JUDGMENT


1. I think I should publish written reasons for this matter because I think it is (so far as I am aware) the first time a case of this nature has come to the Court, so that I will give it the benefit of considered reasons.

2. It is obvious from what I have said during the presentation of the case that I am satisfied in this particular case that the duty imposed upon the Council by the Local Government Act 1993, s 9(2) and the co-relative right conferred by s 12 upon the Applicant as a member of the public (indeed, one more vitally affected than any other member because it is his development application that is before the Council) have been vindicated and the only way for each to be vindicated, in view of the evidence in this case, is for the Court to so declare and for the Court to make appropriate orders in vindication of that right and in enforcement of that duty: see the Local Government Act 1993, s 672 to 674.

3. The matter has been substantially resolved by the Council proffering an undertaking consequent upon the announcement of my finding both as one of fact and of law that the aforesaid duty and the co-relative right have not been taken away by force of any other provision of the Local Government Act, and in particular, s 9(2A).

4. In those circumstances I accept the undertaking offered by the Council that it will not deal with the relevant item at its meeting tonight, that being item No 16 on its Agenda other than to defer consideration of that item to its next meeting of the Planning Committee in two weeks time and that the Report as sought in the paragraph 1 of the originating process (being a copy of the report, the subject of that Item 16) be made available to the Applicant’s Solicitors by the close of business on Friday 9 August with the legal content or the legal advice content in that report expunged and notated in the conventional manner.

5. The Respondent is also ordered to pay the costs of the Applicant in the proceedings in the sum agreed or, failing agreement, as assessed. Detailed reasons for my decision will be published in due course.

Details
AGLC
M and R Civil Pty Limited v Hornsby Council [2003] NSWLEC 14
Case
[2003] NSWLEC 14
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of M & R Civil Pty Limited v Hornsby Council was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The Applicant, M & R Civil Pty Limited, sought an injunction and declaration against the Respondent, Hornsby Council, concerning the Council's duty to make available to the public its business papers and the Applicant's correlative right to inspect such documents free of charge. The key legislative framework in this case was the Local Government Act 1993, and the case was decided by Bignold J.

The central legal issues the court had to address were whether the Council had a duty to make its business papers available to the public and if the Applicant had a right to inspect such documents free of charge. This was particularly pertinent as the Applicant's development application was before the Council. The court needed to determine if these statutory rights and duties were negated by other provisions in the Local Government Act 1993, particularly section 9(2A).

Bignold J held that the Council's duty to make its business papers available to the public, as well as the Applicant's right to inspect such documents free of charge, had not been overridden by any other provision in the Local Government Act 1993. The court found that the Council's actions were in breach of the statutory duty and the Applicant's correlative right. Consequently, the court made a declaration to this effect and issued appropriate orders to enforce the duty and vindicate the right. The Council undertook to defer the consideration of the relevant item on its agenda and to provide the requested report to the Applicant's solicitors, with certain legal content redacted.

The court ordered the Respondent to pay the Applicant's costs of the proceedings. Further detailed reasons for the decision were to be published at a later date.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.