Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Luxeco Property Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1603 Hearing dates: 2 and 3 March 2021 Date of orders: 29 October 2021 Decision date: 29 October 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Espinosa C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Development Application No DA-2019/253 seeking consent for the demolition of the existing dwellings and structures and construction of eleven new multi dwelling housing units and associated common access driveway, parking, landscaping and site works at 82-86 Eastern Valley Way, Willoughby NSW 2069 legally described as Lots 33-35 in DP 20044 is approved subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – multi-dwelling housing – overdevelopment – landscaping – vehicle access and parking – adaptable and affordable housing – impacts on adjoining properties – floor space ratio development standard cl 4.6 written request - orders
Cases Cited: Luxeco Property Pty Ltd v Willoughby Council [2021] NSWLEC 1554
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Luxeco Property Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Willoughby City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Wright SC (Applicant)
P Vergotis (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Holding Redlich (Applicant)
McCabe Curwood Pty Ltd (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/160587 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: On 22 September 2021, I handed down my reasons for judgment in the Class 1 appeal (Luxeco Property Pty Ltd v Willoughby Council [2021] NSWLEC 1554) to uphold the appeal subject to conditions.
-
I directed the Council to prepare and file conditions of consent in the requisite template and to provide them to the Court.
-
The Council filed the conditions in accordance with my direction on 6 October 2021 however there were some omissions which required correcting and this was done on 7 October 2021.
-
Following receipt of the conditions, I requested an electronic copy of the plans to upload onto Caselaw when the final judgment is published. Following that request the Applicant drew to my attention that a number of plans from the tendered bundle of Architectural Drawings marked Exhibit E were inadvertently omitted from the table of Proposed/Draft Conditions of Consent (Exhibit V) and that this omission was not identified until my request for the plans to be approved in electronic form being after 7 October 2021. The Applicant has provided conditions with track changes indicating the plans to be added and included in the conditions of consent.
-
I have reviewed the Exhibit E architectural drawings and I am satisfied that it is proper and appropriate to add and include the following plans:
DA 1.140
07
30/11/2020
DA 1.141
08
14/12/2020
DA 1.142
09
14/12/2020
DA 1.150
03
19/02/2020
DA 1.51
03
19/02/2020
DA 1.152
03
19/02/2020
DA 1.160
02
18/08/2020
DA 1.161
01
16/12/2020
DA 2.120
01
27/08/2020
DA 2.121
01
27/08/2020
DA 5.000
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.001
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.002
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.003
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.005
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.006
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.007
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.008
00
30/11/2020
DA 5.009
00
30/11/2020
-
I am satisfied that the conditions accord with my judgment and I now make the following orders.
-
The Court orders that:
The appeal is upheld.
The Development Application No DA-2019/253 seeking consent for the demolition of the existing dwellings and structures and construction of eleven new multi dwelling housing units and associated common access driveway, parking, landscaping and site works at 82-86 Eastern Valley Way, Willoughby NSW 2069 legally described as Lots 33-35 in DP 20044 is approved subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
……………………….
E Espinosa
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (264152, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- Luxeco Property Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1603
- Case
- [2021] NSWLEC 1603
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the court encompassed the interpretation and application of relevant planning laws and policies, specifically the Local Environment Plan 2013 and the Willoughby City Council’s Development Control Plan. The primary concern was whether the proposed development complied with these legislative instruments and local planning policies, including considerations such as density, scale, and impact on the surrounding environment. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the council’s decision to reject the application was legally sound and if Luxeco’s appeal was justified.
In delivering its judgment, the court meticulously reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties. It concluded that the council’s decision to reject the application was flawed due to misinterpretation of the planning laws and local policies. The court found that the proposed development was in accordance with the Local Environment Plan 2013 and the Willoughby City Council’s Development Control Plan, and that the potential benefits of the development, such as increased housing supply, outweighed the minor adverse impacts identified. Consequently, the court determined that the appeal should be upheld and ordered the approval of the development application subject to specific conditions to mitigate any adverse impacts.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Development Application No DA-2019/253 seeking consent for the demolition of the existing dwellings and structures and construction of eleven new multi dwelling housing units and associated common access driveway, parking, landscaping and site works at 82-86 Eastern Valley Way, Willoughby NSW 2069 legally described as Lots 33-35 in DP 20044 is approved subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.