Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
-
Guppy v Victorian WorkCover Authority
[2010] VSCA 164
Citation 1
…purpose of evaluating the additional impairment which has been caused by the accident.[52] [52] See Guppy v Victorian WorkCover Authority & Anor [2010] VSCA 164 (25 June 2010); Petkovski v Galletti [1994] 1 VR 436 73 In this respect I must: (i) Be satisfied that the plaintiff has established that the consequences…
-
Stijepic v One Force Group Aust Pty Ltd
[2009] VSCA 181
Citation 2
…ness of consequences, may be informed, to some extent, by what is retained.” [54] [53] Stijepic v One Force Group Aust Pty Ltd & Anor [2009] VSCA 181 [54] Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd No 2 [2008] VSCA 260…
-
Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2008] VSCA 260
Citation 3
…y what is retained.” [54] [53] Stijepic v One Force Group Aust Pty Ltd & Anor [2009] VSCA 181 [54] Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd No 2 [2008] VSCA 260…
-
Dressing v Porter
[2006] VSCA 215
Citation 4
…reasons rather suggest that he approached the matter on the footing that there must only be one condition which could satisfy the test.” [48] [2006] VSCA 215 (17 October 2006)…
-
Barlow v Hollis
[2000] VSCA 26
Citation 5
…sorder the consequences of which I take into account in accordance with the decision of the court of appeal in Richards v Wylie. [55] [55] (2000) 1 VR 79…
-
Angelatos v Museum of Victoria
[1999] VSCA 129
Citation 6
…nd after the relevant injury so that the effect of the accident-related additional impairment can be measured and assessed: [45] [1994] 1 VR 436 [46] [1999] VSCA 129 (27 August 1999) • I do not accept that the Act imposes upon the plaintiff a duty to establish the course which the underlying condition, with which…