Lueck (Migration)

[2024] AATA 1621

Lueck (Migration) [2024] AATA 1621 (27 May 2024)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Timo Lueck

REPRESENTATIVE:  Ms Kiska Li

CASE NUMBER:  2202515

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2020/2366588

MEMBER:De-Anne Kelly

DATE:27 May 2024

PLACE OF DECISION:  Brisbane

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

·cl 186.223 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 27 May 2024 at 12:17pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa – Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) – Temporary Residence Transition stream – Architect – subject of an approved nomination – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 186.223

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 10 February 2022 to refuse to grant the applicant an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 25 September 2020. At the time of application, Class EN contained one subclass: Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme).

3. The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 186 visa are set out in Part 186 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the ‘Common criteria’, as well as the criteria of one of three alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, the Direct Entry stream, or the Labour Agreement stream.

4. In the present case, the first named applicant (the applicant) is seeking the visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream, to work in the nominated position of Architect

5. The delegate refused to grant the visas because the applicant did not meet cl 186.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the employer nomination application by Brian John Steendyk was refused being the application referred to in cl.186.223(1).

6. The applicants appeared before the Tribunal on 27 May 2024 to give evidence and present arguments. The Tribunal also received oral evidence from the employer.

7. The applicants were represented in relation to the review.

8. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

9. The issue in the present case is whether the applicants meet cl.186.223(2).

   (2)       The Minister has approved the nomination.

   Nomination of a position

10. Clause 186.223 as applicable in this case is set out in full in an attachment to this decision. Essentially, it requires that the position to which the application relates be the subject of an application for approval of a nomination in the Direct Entry stream. The position must be the one that was the subject of the declaration made as part of the current visa application. In addition, where the associated nomination was made on or after 1 July 2017, it must identify the applicant in relation to the position.

11. In addition, this criterion also requires that:

    ·the person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination

    ·the nomination has been approved and has not been subsequently withdrawn

    ·there is no ‘adverse information’ known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person ‘associated with’ that person (within the meaning of reg 1.13A and reg 1.13B); or it is reasonable to disregard any such information

    ·the position is still available to the applicant, and

    ·the visa application was made no more than six months after the nomination of the position was approved.

12. The visa application was acknowledged by the Department on 25 September 2020 and is consistent with the declaration in s.1114B(3)(d) of Schedule 1 being made in the application for the grant of the visa.

13. Mr Steendyk sole trader of Brian John Steendyk made the nomination and signed the Employment Contract demonstrating that they are the person who will employ the applicant and are the person who made the nomination. The application made was for the approval of the position of Architect.

14. The Department refused to approve the nomination and the nominating employer applied to the Tribunal for review of that decision. The Tribunal set aside the Department’s decision and substituted a decision to approve the nomination in respect of the applicant. The nomination has therefore been approved and has not been withdrawn by the Mr Steendyk sole trader of Brian John Steendyk.

15. There is no information before the Tribunal constituting adverse information regarding the company or its director. There is no evidence before the Tribunal that the Department had adverse information regarding Mr Steendyk sole trader of Brian John Steendyk, being the person who made the nomination or their associates.

16. The most recent employment contract dated 2024 demonstrates that the position is still available to the applicant. The visa application was made on 25 September 2020, and therefore was made no more than six months after the nomination of the position was approved.

17. Therefore, cl.186.223(2) and cl.186.223 are met.

18. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

    DECISION

19. The Tribunal remits the application for Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

    ·cl 186.223 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    De-Anne Kelly
    Member

    
    

    ATTACHMENT A

    186.223(1)     The position to which the application relates is the position:

    (a)nominated in an application for approval that:

    (i)identifies the applicant in relation to the position; and

    (ii)is made in relation to a visa in a Temporary Residence Transition stream; and

    (c)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114B(3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

    (2)     The Minister has approved the nomination.

    (3)     The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn.

    (3A)    Either:

    (a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

    (b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

    (4)     The position is still available to the applicant.

    (5)     The application for the visa is made no more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.