| [2015] FWCA 2177 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Lucknow Nominees Pty Ltd T/A Unitex Industries
(AG2015/673)
LUCKNOW NOMINEES PTY LTD T/A UNITEX INDUSTRIES ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 27 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the LUCKNOW NOMINEES PTY LTD T/A UNITEX INDUSTRIES ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the LUCKNOW NOMINEES PTY LTD T/A UNITEX INDUSTRIES ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2015 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Lucknow Nominees Pty Ltd T/A Unitex Industries. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Based on statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union, the employee organisation to be covered by the agreement, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 27 March 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 3 April 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 September 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE413290 PR562565>
- AGLC
- Lucknow Nominees Pty Ltd T/A Unitex Industries [2015] FWCA 2177
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 2177
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the Fair Work Commission was whether the Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015 met the criteria for approval as a safety net agreement under the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to determine if the agreement provided appropriate safety net protections for the employees and if it was consistent with the objects of the Act. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and if it provided for minimum terms and conditions of employment that were no less favourable than those provided for in the relevant award or registered agreement.
The Fair Work Commission found that the Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015 did not provide adequate safety net protections for employees and, therefore, did not meet the criteria for approval as a safety net agreement. The Commission noted that the agreement contained provisions that were less favourable than those provided for in the relevant award, including provisions relating to overtime rates, penalty rates, and redundancy entitlements. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not genuinely reflect the parties' negotiations and did not provide minimum terms and conditions of employment that were no less favourable than those provided for in the relevant award. As a result, the Fair Work Commission did not approve the Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015 as a safety net agreement.
The Fair Work Commission did not approve the Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015 as a safety net agreement, as it did not provide adequate safety net protections for employees and did not meet the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that were less favourable than those provided for in the relevant award and did not genuinely reflect the parties' negotiations. As a result, the agreement was not approved, and the employees of Unitex Industries will continue to be governed by the relevant award.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.