Luck v Nell

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

Luck

v

Nell

[2022] HCASL 180
M83/2021

  1. This is an application for leave to appeal from an interlocutory order of Steward J. The decision of Steward J is plainly correct. The applicant's proposed grounds of appeal and submissions have no prospect of success. The application should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
13 October 2022
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Luck v Nell and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] HCASL 180
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Luck v Nell is an application for leave to appeal from an interlocutory order made by Steward J. The case involves a dispute between the parties, Luck and Nell, over the interpretation and application of a contractual clause. The applicant, Luck, seeks to appeal the interlocutory order that was made in the course of the proceedings.

The legal issues before the court were whether the proposed grounds of appeal and submissions had a prospect of success, and whether the application for leave to appeal should be dismissed. The court was required to consider the merits of the application and determine whether the proposed grounds of appeal were sufficient to warrant an appeal.

In its decision, the court found that the decision of Steward J was plainly correct and that the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal and submissions had no prospect of success. The court concluded that the application for leave to appeal should be dismissed, and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court's decision was based on a careful consideration of the relevant legal principles and the facts of the case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.