Loxton v New South Wales

Link copied
Case Copied 39 min read

NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL

CITATION:     LOXTON v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [2002]  NSWCA 194

FILE NUMBER(S):
40482/01

HEARING DATE(S):    17 June 2002

JUDGMENT DATE:      26/06/2002

PARTIES:
Danae Loxton by her next friend Debby Loxton - Applicant
State of New South Wales - Respondent

JUDGMENT OF:        Sheller JA Campbell AJA    

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION:       District Court

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):     1439/99 Parramatta

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER:   Delaney DCJ

COUNSEL:
W P Kearns SC/B Hughes - Appellant
A C Bridge SC - Respondent

SOLICITORS:
Napier Keen Solicitors - Appellant
Hicksons - Respondent

CATCHWORDS:
DAMAGES - injuries sustained by school student - challenge to trial Judge's findings on damages - distinction between general damages and special damages - future economic loss/ reduced earning capacity - medical expenses - new trial rejected

LEGISLATION CITED:
District Court Rules 1973
Supreme Court Rules 1970
Suitors' Fund Act 1951

DECISION:
1  Appeal allowed
2  Set aside the verdict and judgment of Delaney DCJ of 6 June 2001
3  In lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $199,542.43 made up of general damages of $125,000;   Griffiths v Kerkemeyer $18,043.48;  agreed out of pocket expenses $1,498.95;  future economic loss $40,000;  future medical expenses $15,000;  together with interest on 50 per cent of the amount awarded for general damages at the rate of 5 per cent and interest on the amount awarded for past care at 5 per cent up to 2 June 2000 and thereafter at 10 per cent to the date of judgment
4 The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if so entitled
5  The judgment to date from 6 June 2001.

JUDGMENT:

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL

CA 40482/01
DC 1439/99

SHELLER JA
CAMPBELL AJA

LOXTON v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES

The appellant appeals against the award of damages made by Judge Delaney on 6 June 2001.  His Honour found the respondent liable in negligence for injuries suffered by the appellant and that conclusion was not challenged.

On 30 April 1996 the appellant was injured while present as a primary school student at Arcardia Public School, a school for which the respondent is responsible.  The appellant was aged 11 when she was injured after she and other school students were part of a human pyramid which collapsed.  The appellant was left by the accident with a lifelong condition of neurogenic bladder and bowel, and with an enduring sleep problem.  She had to carry an impairment of gait and lower limb function and suffered a substantial impact on her self confidence.

Judge Delaney awarded the appellant damages in the sum of approximately $131,500, comprised of the following:

-              general damages of $85,000;
-              interest on past general damages of $4,000;
-              future medical expenses of $1,000;
-              damages for reduced earning capacity of $40,000;
-              agreed out-of-pocket expenses of $1,498.95.

The appellant appealed on the grounds that the damages…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Loxton v New South Wales and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2002] NSWCA 194
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal in *Loxton v New South Wales* concerned a challenge to a District Court judge's findings on damages awarded to a school student who sustained injuries. The dispute centred on the assessment of various components of the damages claim, including general damages, future economic loss, and medical expenses.

The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the trial judge had erred in their assessment of the damages, particularly in relation to future economic loss and the distinction between general and special damages. The court was required to determine if the awarded sum adequately compensated the appellant for their injuries and losses, and whether a new trial was warranted.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the trial judge's assessment of damages was flawed. The court distinguished between general damages, which compensate for non-economic loss, and special damages, which cover quantifiable economic losses. The court re-assessed the damages, increasing the total award to $199,542.43, which included specific amounts for general damages, past care (Griffiths v Kerkemeyer), agreed out-of-pocket expenses, future economic loss, and future medical expenses. The court also made specific orders regarding the calculation of interest on different components of the award.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 Appeal allowed

2 Set aside the verdict and judgment of Delaney DCJ of 6 June 2001

3 In lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $199,542.43 made up of general damages of $125,000; Griffiths v Kerkemeyer $18,043.48; agreed out of pocket expenses $1,498.95; future economic loss $40,000; future medical expenses $15,000; together with interest on 50 per cent of the amount awarded for general damages at the rate of 5 per cent and interest on the amount awarded for past care at 5 per cent up to 2 June 2000 and thereafter at 10 per cent to the date of judgment

4 The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if so entitled

5 The judgment to date from 6 June 2001.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.