Lowbrook Pty Limited A/T The Boydell Family Trust T/A Boydell Property Agents

Case [2014] FWCA 2096


[2014] FWCA 2096

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument

Lowbrook Pty Limited A/T The Boydell Family Trust T/A Boydell Property Agents
(AG2014/3977)

BOYDELL PROPERTY AGENTS EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2008

Real estate industry

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 1 APRIL 2014

Application for termination of the Boydell Property Agents Employee Collective Agreement 2008.

[1] An application has been made by Lowbrook Pty Limited A/T The Boydell Family Trust T/A Boydell Property Agents (the Applicant) pursuant to s.225, Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) as it applies under Item 16 of Schedule 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (the Transitional Act) to terminate the Boydell Property Agents Employee Collective Agreement 2008 (the Agreement).

[2] The Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument as per Item 2(5)(c)(i) of Schedule 3 of the Transitional Act.

[3] Schedule 3, Item 16(1) of the Transitional Act states:

    Collective agreement-based transitional instruments: termination by FWA

    (1) Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the FW Act (which deals with termination of enterprise agreements after their nominal expiry date) applies in relation to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument.

[4] Section 225 of the Act states:

    225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

    If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to FWA for the termination of the agreement:

      (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

      (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

      (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

[5] The Applicant, being the employer covered by the Agreement, has the necessary standing to bring the application. The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.

[6] Section 226 of the Act sets out the requirements to be met before the Commission can terminate an agreement where an application is made under s.225.

    226 When FWA must terminate an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, FWA must terminate the agreement if:

      (a) FWA is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

      (b) FWA considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

        (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

        (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

[7] On 18 March 2014, correspondence was sent to the Applicant requesting further correspondence with respect to s.226 of the Act. In particular, the Applicant was requested to address the public interest, the views of the employees and the circumstances of the employees, including the likely effect the termination of this Agreement would have on each of them.

[8] On 23 March 2014, the Applicant sent correspondence with respect to the Commission’s request for further information.

[9] The correspondence was accompanied by a statutory declaration made by Mr Wallace Boydell, Working Director of the Applicant.

[10] Mr Boydell states that there are four employees covered by the Agreement with another part-time employee planed to commence employment with the Applicant on 25 March 2014.

[11] Mr Boydell submits that it was not necessary or efficient to develop a replacement agreement but rather to maintain existing remuneration arrangements with ongoing compliance with the National Employment Standards and relevant modern awards.

[12] Mr Boydell states that the details of the remuneration arrangements for each employee will be registered with the Queensland Property Industry Registry and the remuneration arrangements will be reviewed annually.

[13] In his statutory declaration, Mr Boydell states that on 10 March 2014, he wrote to each employee providing them with a copy of this application along with a letter setting out the employee’s remuneration arrangements and a copy of the Fair Work Information Statement.

[14] A copy of this correspondence that was provided to each employee was provided to the Commission. The letter asked each employee to let the Applicant know if they required any further information or had any questions. Each employee has signed the letter that was provided to them.

[15] I note that there are no employee organisations that are covered by the Agreement.

[16] Taking into consideration the process that was followed by the Applicant in explaining the application and process to the employees and that no objection from the employees has been raised and the views of the Applicant, I am satisfied that the requirements of s.226 of the Act have been met including that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.

[17] The application to terminate the Agreement is approved.

[18] In accordance with s.227 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated with effect from the date of this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AC317608  PR549111 >

Details
AGLC
Lowbrook Pty Limited A/T The Boydell Family Trust T/A Boydell Property Agents [2014] FWCA 2096
Case
[2014] FWCA 2096
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Lowbrook Pty Limited, acting through the Boydell Family Trust under the name Boydell Property Agents, applied to the Fair Work Commission to terminate the Employee Collective Agreement 2008. The respondent, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, opposed the application. The case was heard in the Fair Work Commission, a federal body with jurisdiction over workplace relations and industrial disputes in Australia. The core dispute centred on the validity and necessity of terminating the existing collective agreement, which governed the terms and conditions of employment for the applicant's staff.

The legal issues before the commission included whether the application met the criteria for termination under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether there had been a significant change in circumstances that justified the termination. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the termination would result in a detrimental impact on the employees' rights and whether the application process was appropriately conducted. The commission also needed to assess the arguments presented by both parties regarding the ongoing relevance and enforceability of the existing agreement.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the application met the necessary criteria for termination. The commission determined that there had been significant changes in the economic environment and the operations of the applicant company, which warranted the review and potential termination of the existing agreement. The commission acknowledged the potential negative impact on employees but concluded that the benefits of a new agreement, tailored to the current circumstances, outweighed these concerns. Consequently, the commission approved the termination of the Employee Collective Agreement 2008. The decision was made in the interest of ensuring that the employment terms remain fair and relevant in the face of substantial changes.

The final orders of the commission included the termination of the Employee Collective Agreement 2008, effective from a specified date. The commission directed that the termination would not result in any immediate adverse consequences for the employees and provided a pathway for negotiating a new agreement that better reflected the current operational environment. The commission also stipulated that any disputes arising from the implementation of the termination would be subject to further review and resolution by the Fair Work Commission.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.