Louis Zammit v Fetch Recruitment

Case

[2021] FWC 6564

9 DECEMBER 2021

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2021] FWC 6564
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Louis Zammit
v
Fetch Recruitment
(U2021/10180)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 9 DECEMBER 2021

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

[1] On 11 November 2021 Mr Louis Zammit made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act). Mr Zammit alleged he was unfairly dismissed by Fetch Recruitment (the Respondent) on 29 September 2021, having been notified on 3 November 2021.

[2] The application was incomplete in that Mr Zammit did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

[3] On 12 November 2021 the Commission attempted to contact Mr Zammit on his nominated telephone number to discuss payment of the required fee, however, Mr Zammit did not answer the call. A voicemail message was left requesting Mr Zammit call the Commission to pay the filing fee.

[4] Later that day, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Zammit’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received within 14 days, the application may be dismissed.

[5] A final attempt to contact Mr Zammit was made by the Commission on 24 November 2021 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered and a voicemail message was left advising Mr Zammit that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.

[6] To date there has been no response from Mr Zammit, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

[7] Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

[8] Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

[9] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act. An order 1 to this effect will be issued with this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR736598>

 1   PR736599.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0