FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 1)
Losif & Losif [2024] FedCFamC1F 106
File number(s): BRC 3570 of 2019 Judgment of: BAUMANN J Date of judgment: 15 February 2024 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – REVIEW OF SENIOR JUDICIAL REGISTRAR’S DECISION – Parenting – Application for Review dismissed Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 67Q Cases cited: Losif & Losif [2022] FedCFamC2F 1372
Losif & Losif [2023] FedCFamC1F 1084
Rice & Asplund (1979) FLC 90-725
Division: Division 1 First Instance Number of paragraphs: 27 Date of hearing: 15 February 204 Place: Brisbane Solicitor for the Applicant: Litigant in person Solicitor for the Respondent: Litigant in person ORDERS
BRC 3570 of 2019 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN: MR LOSIF
Applicant
AND: MS LOSIF
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
BAUMANN J
DATE OF ORDER:
15 FEBRUARY 2024
THE COURT ORDERS:
1.That the Review Application filed 31 December 2023 be dismissed.
2.That within forty eight (48) hours, and by no later than 4.00pm on 17 February 2024, the mother return the child, Z born 2018 (“the child”) to the father at G Street, Suburb H, Queensland.
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
3.That the Registry of the Court provide the Australian Federal Police with a copy of these Orders and the Reasons for Judgment delivered today.
4.That the Directions Hearing listed before a Judicial Registrar on 19 February 2024 be vacated.
5.That these proceedings be adjourned for Directions Hearing before a Judicial Registrar at 11.30am on 14 March 2024 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) at Brisbane.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Losif & Losif has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Settled from the oral reasons delivered)BAUMANN J:
The parents of the four children, W, now aged 14; X, now aged 12; Y, now aged nine; and Z, born 18 August 2018, now aged five and a half years of age, have been in conflict about parenting arrangements for their children for some time. As a result of the history which I will succinctly give next, a Senior Judicial Registrar made an Order on 29 December 2023, the effect of which was that the mother return the child Z to the care…
Continue reading Losif & Losif
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Losif & Losif [2024] FedCFamC1F 106
- Case
- [2024] FedCFamC1F 106
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the circumstances surrounding the senior judicial registrar's decision and the merits of Mr Losif's application for review. The court determined that the senior judicial registrar had appropriately exercised their discretion and that the application for review did not present any grounds for altering the existing order. Baumann J found that the senior judicial registrar's decision was sound, and there was no basis for the court to intervene. As a result, the application for review was dismissed, and the existing parenting order remained in effect.
The court ordered that Ms Losif return the child to Mr Losif by a specific time and date, with the Australian Federal Police informed of the court's orders. The court also vacated the upcoming directions hearing and scheduled a new Directions Hearing for March. The court's decision underscored the importance of adhering to existing parenting orders and the limited circumstances in which a review application would succeed.
Orders
Orders of the court
BRC 3570 of 2019
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN:
MR LOSIF
Applicant
AND:
MS LOSIF
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
BAUMANN J
DATE OF ORDER:
15 FEBRUARY 2024
THE COURT ORDERS:
1. That the Review Application filed 31 December 2023 be dismissed.
2. That within forty eight (48) hours, and by no later than 4.00pm on 17 February 2024, the mother return the child, Z born 2018 (“the child”) to the father at G Street, Suburb H, Queensland.
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
3. That the Registry of the Court provide the Australian Federal Police with a copy of these Orders and the Reasons for Judgment delivered today.
4. That the Directions Hearing listed before a Judicial Registrar on 19 February 2024 be vacated.
5. That these proceedings be adjourned for Directions Hearing before a Judicial Registrar at 11.30am on 14 March 2024 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) at Brisbane.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.