Longstaff v Elliott

Case

[1999] NSWCA 384

14 October 1999

No judgment structure available for this case.

CITATION: LONGSTAFF v ELLIOTT [1999] NSWCA 384
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40220/99
HEARING DATE(S): 14 October 1999
JUDGMENT DATE:
14 October 1999

PARTIES :


CLIVE HENDRY LONGSTAFF v MURIEL BETTY ELLIOTT
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA; Beazley JA; Fitzgerald JA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 4356/96
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Master McLaughlin
COUNSEL: I G Harrison SC (Appellant)
J Wilson (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Teece Hodgson & Ward (Appellant)
Gordon Garling Moffitt (Respondent)
CATCHWORDS:
DECISION: Appeal dismissed - orders given

    THE SUPREME COURT
    OF NEW SOUTH WALES
    COURT OF APPEAL
    CA 40220/99
    EQ 4356/96
HANDLEY JA
BEAZLEY JA
FITZGERALD JA


    Thursday 14 October 1999

    CLIVE HENDRY LONGSTAFF v MURIEL BETTY ELLIOTT

    JUDGMENT

1    HANDLEY JA: The Court is of the view that this is a very clear case and that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons given by the Master. 2    The appellant must pay the respondent’s costs of this appeal. This is not and is not intended to be an order that he is entitled as executor to reimbursement for his own costs or the respondent’s costs out of the estate.

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Negligence & Tort

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Causation

  • Damages

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0