Longstaff v Elliott
Case
•
[1999] NSWCA 384
•14 October 1999
No judgment structure available for this case.
CITATION: LONGSTAFF v ELLIOTT [1999] NSWCA 384 FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40220/99 HEARING DATE(S): 14 October 1999 JUDGMENT DATE:
14 October 1999PARTIES :
CLIVE HENDRY LONGSTAFF v MURIEL BETTY ELLIOTTJUDGMENT OF: Handley JA; Beazley JA; Fitzgerald JA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 4356/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Master McLaughlin
COUNSEL: I G Harrison SC (Appellant)
J Wilson (Respondent)SOLICITORS: Teece Hodgson & Ward (Appellant)
Gordon Garling Moffitt (Respondent)CATCHWORDS: DECISION: Appeal dismissed - orders given
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40220/99
EQ 4356/96
HANDLEY JA
BEAZLEY JA
FITZGERALD JA
Thursday 14 October 1999CLIVE HENDRY LONGSTAFF v MURIEL BETTY ELLIOTT
JUDGMENT
1 HANDLEY JA: The Court is of the view that this is a very clear case and that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons given by the Master. 2 The appellant must pay the respondent’s costs of this appeal. This is not and is not intended to be an order that he is entitled as executor to reimbursement for his own costs or the respondent’s costs out of the estate.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Causation
-
Damages
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Longstaff v Elliott [1999] NSWCA 384
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0