Longhorn Investments Pty Ltd T/A Campbell’s Newsagency
[2021] FWCA 1848
•8 APRIL 2021
| [2021] FWCA 1848 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Longhorn Investments Pty Ltd T/A Campbell’s Newsagency
(AG2021/4109)
CAMPBELL’S NEWS AGENCY EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2007
Retail industry | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 8 APRIL 2021 |
Application for termination of the Campbell’s News Agency Employee Collective Agreement 2007.
[1] This decision concerns an application by Longhorn Investments Pty Ltd T/A Campbell’s Newsagency (the Applicant or Campbell’s) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the FW Act). The application seeks to terminate the Campbell’s News Agency Employee Collective Agreement 2007 (the Collective Agreement). The Collective Agreement was approved under Part 8 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) in 2007 by the Workplace Authority 1. The Collective Agreement had a nominal expiry date 5 years from the date of lodgement with the Workplace Authority.
[2] A hearing by telephone was conducted in this matter on 8 April 2021. At the conclusion of that hearing, I expressed my intention to terminate the Collective Agreement and indicated that I would subsequently provide a written decision.
[3] The Collective Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument 2 for the purposes of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisional and Consequential Amendment) Act 2009 (the Transitional Act). This means, in effect, that the Collective Agreement remained in force under the terms of the FW Act, subject to certain overriding provisions including the National Employment Standards and the minimum base rates provide by any modern award covering the parties. In this case, the General Retail Industry Award 2020 (GRI Award) covers the parties although it does not presently apply to them due to the continued operation of the Collective Agreement.3
[4] I observe that in practice, other than for a uniform payment, Campbell’s has for some time been applying the more beneficial terms of the GRI Award.
[5] Item 16 of Schedule 3 of the Transitional Act provides that an agreement of this kind may be terminated by the Commission under Part 2-4 of the FW Act.
[6] Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the FW Act provides:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.
227 When termination comes into operation
If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.”
[7] The application was accompanied by a statutory declaration of Ms Sarah Campbell, Owner/Director of the Applicant, relevantly setting out the grounds for the application to terminate the Collective Agreement. Those grounds included contentions to the effect of the following:
• The Collective Agreement is outdated and the employer has instead relied on the GRI Award to fill any gaps in the Collective Agreement;
• To provide clarity to the business and employees and to avoid possible discrepancies, the business intends to move solely to the modern award;
• To be required to continue to continue to amend the Collective Agreement would be costly and provide no benefit to the business or employees.
[8] Given the status of the Collective Agreement, the Applicant is entitled to apply for its termination pursuant to s.225 of the FW Act.
[9] In the lead up to the hearing of this matter, directions were issued requiring the Applicant to ensure that any affected employees were aware of this hearing and provide details for any affected employee to make a contribution about the application to terminate the agreement. I note that Campbell’s has confirmed that all employees were provided a copy of the notice of listing and information was available to explain the application.
[10] The Commission did not receive any communication from any employee covered by the Collective Agreement expressing concerns or otherwise wishing to be heard in relation to the application. Given this fact, and the evidence provided by Ms Campbell, I am satisfied that the employees support, or at least do not oppose, the application.
[11] The statutory environment in which the Collective Agreement now operates is significantly different to that in which it was approved. The continued operation of the Collective Agreement also prevents the full legal application of the GRI Award. 4
[12] Although Campbell’s has applied more beneficial arrangements than required by the Collective Agreement, it is appropriate that what is now a very much outdated and largely redundant instrument no longer apply. Employees will not be disadvantaged by the termination of the instrument and the formal conclusion of the Collective Agreement is sought by the applicant employer.
[13] Having had regard to the material provided with the application and during the hearing, I am satisfied that it would not be contrary to the public interest to terminate the Collective Agreement and that it is appropriate in all of the circumstances, including having regard to the views of the relevant parties, to do so. Given these findings and the terms of the FW Act provided in s.226, the Commission is obliged to terminate the Collective Agreement.
[14] The Collective Agreement is terminated, and the termination will take effect on and from 11:59 pm on 20 April 2021.
COMMISSIONER
1 The Workplace Authority was an Australian Government Statutory Agency that was in existence from 1 July 2007 to1 July 2009.
2 Item 2(5)(c)(i) of Schedule 3 of the Transitional Act.
3 s.47 and s.48 of the FW Act.
4 Item 41 of Schedule 3A of the Transitional Act – the Collective Agreement prevails over the modern award to the extent of any inconsistency – subject to the minimum standards of the FW Act.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AC312008 PR728382>
0
0
0