Long and Long (No.2)

Case [2017] FCCA 3118


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

LONG & LONG (No.2) [2017] FCCA 3118
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Parenting – Contravention application – contravention application dismissed – variation of past final parenting orders.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.70NAC, 70NAE, 70NBA, 60B, 60CA, 60CC

Cases cited:

Long & Long [2014] FCCA 1734

Rice & Asplund (1979) FLC 90 – 725

Tindall & Saldo [2015] FamCAFC 1

Applicant: MR LONG
Respondent: MS LONG
File Number: PAC 4450 of 2012
Judgment of: Judge Newbrun
Hearing date: 29 May 2017
Date of Last Submission: 30 November 2017
Delivered at: Parramatta
Delivered on: 14 December 2017

REPRESENTATION

Applicant: Self-represented
Respondent: Self-represented

ORDERS

  1. The mother’s application that she have sole parental responsibility for the children, referred to in her Reply filed 4 March 2016, is dismissed.

  2. The father’s Contravention Application filed 26 July 2016 is dismissed.

  3. Orders 15, 16 and 17 of the Court’s orders of 25 June 2014 are varied such that those orders will now provide as follows:

    Order 15: commencing 15 December 2017, once in every 3 month period, the father is permitted to travel to Queensland with the children for a block period of up to 5 nights (subject to an extension of this 5 night block period during, and only to the extent of, the father’s permitted school holiday time with the children) upon the father giving at least 28 days’ notice of the date of travel to the mother.

    Order 16: Any travel to Queensland authorised by order 15 above shall only occur:

    (a)during any school holiday period that the father is entitled to spend with the children pursuant to order 8, or

    (b)during the time that the father is entitled to spend with the children pursuant to order 7 g), with the father being permitted to extend such time in order 7 g) (so as to total 5 nights) until the commencement of school Thursday in the first week.

    Order 17: For the purpose of orders 15 and 16, the father is to provide to the mother the address and contact details of any place where he and the children will be staying throughout the period of travel.

THE COURT NOTES THAT:

  1. At the hearing, the Court notes the father was content that the mother be permitted to authorise the children to receive the usual immunisations.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Long & Long (No.2) is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT PARRAMATTA

PAC 4450 of 2012

MR LONG

Applicant

And

MS LONG

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The children the subject of the present applications before the Court are X born (omitted) 2009 and Y born (omitted) 2010.

  2. The applications presently before the Court are:

    a)The father’s Contravention Application filed 26 July 2016;

    b)The mother’s Reply filed 4 March 2016, specifically, the mother’s proposed orders that:

    i)the mother have sole parental responsibility for the children; this proposed order is opposed by…

Continue reading Long and Long (No.2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Long and Long (No.2) [2017] FCCA 3118
Case
[2017] FCCA 3118
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Long and Long (No.2)*, Judge Newbrun of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered applications by both the mother and the father concerning their children. The mother sought sole parental responsibility, while the father filed a contravention application.

The court was required to determine whether to grant the mother sole parental responsibility, whether the father had contravened previous court orders, and how to vary existing orders regarding the father's travel with the children to Queensland. Additionally, the court noted the father's agreement regarding the mother's authority to authorise childhood immunisations.

Judge Newbrun dismissed the mother's application for sole parental responsibility and the father's contravention application. The court varied existing orders to permit the father to travel to Queensland with the children once every three months for up to five nights, commencing 15 December 2017. This travel is subject to the father providing 28 days' notice to the mother and must occur during school holidays or specific periods of parental time, with provisions for extending the duration to align with school terms. The father is also required to provide the mother with accommodation and contact details during these trips.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The mother’s application that she have sole parental responsibility for the children, referred to in her Reply filed 4 March 2016, is dismissed.

2.

The father’s Contravention Application filed 26 July 2016 is dismissed.

3.

Orders 15, 16 and 17 of the Court’s orders of 25 June 2014 are varied such that those orders will now provide as follows:

Order 15: commencing 15 December 2017, once in every 3 month period, the father is permitted to travel to Queensland with the children for a block period of up to 5 nights (subject to an extension of this 5 night block period during, and only to the extent of, the father’s permitted school holiday time with the children) upon the father giving at least 28 days’ notice of the date of travel to the mother.

Order 16: Any travel to Queensland authorised by order 15 above shall only occur:

(a) during any school holiday period that the father is entitled to spend with the children pursuant to order 8, or

(b) during the time that the father is entitled to spend with the children pursuant to order 7 g), with the father being permitted to extend such time in order 7 g) (so as to total 5 nights) until the commencement of school Thursday in the first week.

Order 17: For the purpose of orders 15 and 16, the father is to provide to the mother the address and contact details of any place where he and the children will be staying throughout the period of travel.

THE COURT NOTES THAT:

4.

At the hearing, the Court notes the father was content that the mother be permitted to authorise the children to receive the usual immunisations.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.