Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lombardi v Bayside Council [2020] NSWLEC 1397 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 19 June 2020 Date of orders: 27 August 2020 Decision date: 27 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The orders of the Court are:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans listed in condition 2 of the conditions at Annexure A to this agreement.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away under s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed sum of $10,000 within 28 days of these orders.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development application no. DA 2019/250, as amended, for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a two-storey boarding house comprising 8 single rooms at 9 Fleet Street, Carlton is approved subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – demolition and construction of a new boarding house – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000
Rockdale Local Environmental Plan 2011
State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009
State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniele Lombardi (Applicant)
Bayside Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
A Gough (Solicitor) (Applicant)
J Cole (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Storey & Gough Lawyers (Australia) (Solicitor) (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/97347 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) by Daniele Lombardi (Applicant) who is appealing the actual refusal of their development application, DA 2019/250, by Bayside Council. The application seeks consent for demolition of existing structures and construction of a two-storey boarding house at 9 Fleet Street, Carlton (Lot 1 DP 921700).
-
In exercising the functions of the consent authority on the appeal, the Court has the power to determine the development application pursuant to s 4.16 of the EPA Act.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979(the LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 19 June 2020. Following the conciliation, an agreement under s 34(3) of the LEC Act was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to them. The decision agreed upon is that the appeal is upheld, subject to the conditions of consent annexed to this judgment.
-
As the presiding Commissioner, I am satisfied that the decision is one that the Court can make in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the LEC Act). I have formed this state of satisfaction for the following reasons:
The development application was lodged with the consent of the owner of the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Lombardi v Bayside Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWLEC 1397
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant could rely on amended plans to support the development application. The court had to determine if the applicant was entitled to rely on these plans, and if so, whether the amended application met the necessary criteria for approval. Additionally, the court needed to assess the conditions of consent and whether they were appropriate and sufficient for the proposed development.
The court found that the applicant was indeed permitted to rely on the amended plans. It held that the amended plans sufficiently addressed the council's concerns and met the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The court also considered the conditions of consent and determined that they were reasonable and appropriate. Consequently, the appeal was upheld, and the development application was approved subject to the specified conditions.
The court further ordered that the applicant be granted leave to rely on the amended plans as listed in condition 2 of the conditions at Annexure A. It also mandated the applicant to pay the respondent's costs thrown away under s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed sum of $10,000 within 28 days of these orders. Lastly, the court approved the amended development application, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Orders
Orders of the court
The orders of the Court are:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans listed in condition 2 of the conditions at Annexure A to this agreement.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away under s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed sum of $10,000 within 28 days of these orders.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development application no. DA 2019/250, as amended, for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a two-storey boarding house comprising 8 single rooms at 9 Fleet Street, Carlton is approved subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.