Logue and Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services
[2005] AATA 364
•21 March 2005
Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2005] AATA 364
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No N2004/796
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DIVISION ) Re ROBERT LOGUE Applicant
And
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
Respondent
WRITTEN REASONS FOR DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member, Mrs Josephine Kelly Date of Written Reasons for Decision 26 April 2005
Date 21 March 2005
Place Sydney
Decision
The reviewable decision, being the decision of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal in relation to a hearing on 9 June 2004 which was despatched on 16 June 2004, is set aside. Substituted for that decision:
(i)There was a debt for the 2000/2001 tax year in the amount of $162.77 which amount has been repaid;
(ii)There is no debt for the 2001/2002 financial year;
(iii)There is no debt for the 2002/2003 financial year; and
(iv)An amount of $29.21 which was over-recovered is to be repaid to the Applicant by the Respondent.
[sgd] Senior Member, Mrs Josephine Kelly
CATCHWORDS
SOCIAL SECURITY – family tax benefit – are calculations of debts correct – rounding of figures for calculations of debts – decision set aside
WRITTEN REASONS FOR ORAL DECISION
26 April 2005 Senior Member, Mrs Josephine Kelly 1. This matter was heard on 24 February 2005 in Newcastle and on 21 March 2005 in Sydney and the decision was given at the end of the hearing on the 21 March 2005. The Applicant, Mr Logue, appealed from the decision of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal (“SSAT”) dated 9 June 2004 concerning Family Tax Benefit (“FTB”) paid to Mr Logue. The effect of that decision was to affirm Centrelink’s reconciliation calculation decisions for the years ended 30 June 2001, 2002 and 2003 and that debts raised for 2001 and 2002 were recoverable.
2. The issue was whether the calculations of the debts raised by Centrelink in relation to Family Tax Benefit paid to Mr Logue for the tax years 2000/2001, 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 were correct. Those debts were $159.32, $124.89 and and $44.94 respectively.
3. At the hearing before me, the Respondent, the Secretary of the Department of Family and Community Services (“the Secretary”) sought a variation of the SSAT decision on the basis of recalculation of the debt. That recalculation was set out in its Statement of Facts and Contentions and attachments (exhibit R1). The decision sought was that:
“i) there is a debt for the 2000/2001 tax year, in the amount of $162.77 and this debt ought be recovered;
ii) there is no debt for the 2001/2002 financial year;
iii) there is no debt for the 2002/2003 financial year; and,
iv) an amount of $61.69, over-recovered by the Respondent, be paid to the Applicant by the Respondent”.
4. At the beginning of the hearing in Newcastle, it emerged that the sum of $162.77 referred to in relation to 2000/2001 had been paid by Mr Logue. Mr Logue had understood the wording of “i)” above as meaning that he had not paid it. That was also how I had interpreted that statement. Such an interpretation meant that Mr Logue owed Centrelink $101.08. That however was not intended by the Secretary. Ms Garcia, who represented the Secretary, acknowledged that the amount of $162.77 had been repaid. Rather, the wording was intended to indicate that in the tax year 2000/2001 a debt had been properly raised and hence was “recoverable”. At that point, it seemed that the Secretary owed Mr Logue approximately $61.69. Initially, Mr Logue said that if the statement in “i)” had not been made, he would not have brought the proceedings. However, later I understood his position to be that there was a matter of principle involved. Mr Logue said that this application was forced by Centrelink because it refused to discuss its decisions.
5. He also argued that item “iv)” was incorrect. He said he was not owed anything.
6. He acknowledged the utility of exhibit R1, paragraphs 36 to 44 (excluding 43) and Annexure B which is a detailed breakdown of payments he received, the amount of FTB paid to him, deductions made, arrears paid to him and additional payments/reissued payments made. This material provided the kind of explanation Mr Logue had wanted but had not been given by Centrelink, although he disagreed with some of the calculations.
7. He had prepared comprehensive material in support of his case including an Opening Statement, and Exhibits A1 to A4.
8. At Newcastle, Ms Garcia, Mr Logue, and I went through all of the calculations that Mr Logue disagreed with, by referring to Exhibit R1 and Annexure B.. Mr Logue was critical of the SSAT’s approach to “rounding”. The SSAT noted that in relation to the 2001 and 2002 tax years, Mr Logue’s calculations “largely agreed with the amounts calculated by Centrelink ($1,886.03 and $2,077.19) respectively, with any difference probably attributable to rounding” (T2 p 5). As he said, such errors can have a significant effect when cumulative.
9. At the end of the hearing on that day, the only amount in issue was a debt of $44.94 raised for the 2002/2003 financial year, which affected the amount in item “iv)” above. The matter was adjourned to be resumed in Sydney. I directed the Secretary to provide an amended Statement of Facts and Contentions and Annexure B which reflected the agreed figures for the next day of the hearing, which was done. A copy of that material is attached and marked Annexure A.
10. In the hearing on 21 March 2005, Ms Garcia provided a complicated explanation in relation to the amount of $44.94. In summary, that amount had been recorded incorrectly. With that matter resolved, agreement was reached between the parties and the decision was made accordingly on that day. It was:
The reviewable decision, being the decision of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal in relation to a hearing on 9 June 2004 which was despatched on 16 June 2004, is set aside. Substituted for that decision:
There was a debt for the 2000/2001 tax year in the amount of $162.77 which amount has been repaid;
There is no debt for the 2001/2002 financial year;
There is no debt for the 2002/2003 financial year; and
An amount of $29.21 which was over-recovered is to be repaid to the Applicant by the Respondent.
I certify that the 10 preceding paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for the decision herein of Senior Member, Mrs Josephine Kelly
Signed: Miss Sacha Keady
AssociateDate/s of Hearing 24 February 2005, 21 March 2005
Date of Decision 21 March 2005
Applicant Representative Self Represented
Advocate for the Respondent Andrea Garcia
Annexure A
-
-
AAT No. N2004/796 Applicant Robert Logue Respondent Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services SECRETARY’S STATEMENT OF FACTS & CONTENTIONS
Decision Under Review
The decision of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal, made on 9 June 2004, that affirmed the decision made by Centrelink, on 17 June 2003, to confirm reconciliation calculations for the years ended 30 June 2001, 2002 and 2003 and the debts that arose in 2001 and 2002.
Issues
1) Whether the reconciliation calculations for the 2001, 2002 and 2003 tax years are correct
Facts
29/01/03 Following a hearing at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) it was decided Gregory, Matthew and Alison Logue were Family Tax Benefit (FTB) children of the Applicant and Mrs Logue for the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 financial years. It was also determined the Applicant's percentages of Family Tax Benefit for the children during the financial years in question were as follows:
Ÿ 18 per cent for Gregory
Ÿ 17 per cent for Matthew
Ÿ 13 per cent for Alison
At the hearing, the Applicant and Mrs Logue agreed to having their FTB entitlement recalculated on this basis (T78).
11/04/03 After having recalculated the Applicant's entitlement to FTB for the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 financial years, Centrelink notified him that he was overpaid FTB, in the amount of $159.32, for the 2000/2001 financial year and $124.89 for the 2001/2002 financial year and these amounts were to be recovered (T82).
22/05/03 Applicant requested a review of this decision, by an Authorised Review Officer. More specifically he did not agree with Centrelink's calculations (T87).
17/06/03 Upon review of this decision, an Authorised Review Officer affirmed the decision (T90).
26/03/04 Applicant requested a review of the decision by the Social Security Appeals Tribunal 5(SSAT) (T93).
15/04/04 Following a notice received by the SSAT, the Authorised Review Officer sent the Applicant a letter requesting he contact Centrelink to clarify the specific subject of his appeal to the SSAT (T94).
27/04/04 The Authorised Review Officer notified the SSAT, the Applicant's appeal to the SSAT related to reconciliation debts for the 2000/2001, 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 financial years. As a debt relevant to the 2002/2003 financial year, amounting to $44.94, had not been reviewed, the Authorised Review Officer proceeded to review this decision. In doing so, the Authorised Review Officer decided the debt of $44.94 pertaining to the 2002/2003 financial year ought to be waived (T95).
09/06/04 SSAT affirmed the decision made by Centrelink (T2).
01/07/04 An application for review of decision was received by the AAT (T1).
Contentions
1. The Respondent submits the Applicant is not appealing against the debts. He is appealing against perceived Centrelink errors in the reconciliation calculations for the 2001, 2002 and 2003 tax years.
2. The Applicant's entitlement to Family Tax Benefit is worked out having regard to Schedule 1 of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 (hereafter: the FA Act). The amount payable depends on factors including the amount of family income, how many children a person has, the percentage of time a child or children are in the person's care and how old the children are.
3. Section 70(a) of the A New Tax System (Family Assistance)[Administration] Act 1999 (hereafter: the FA Admin Act) provides that a family assistance debt only arises if another provision of the legislation makes it a debt. Section 71(1) of the FA Admin Act provides if a person was not entitled to FTB in respect of a period or event, the amount so paid is a debt due to the Commonwealth. Section 72(2) of the FA Admin Act provides that if a person has received more than the correct amount the difference between the correct amount and the amount received is a debt due to the Commonwealth.
4. The Respondent notes that a $1000 tolerance waiver is to be applied to FTB debts raised for the 2000/2001 financial year, in accordance with section 102 of the FA Admin Act and the Family Assistance Estimate Tolerance (Transition) Determination 2001.
Family Tax Benefit Calculations for 2000/2001 financial year
5. The percentage of time the Applicant had his three children in his care in the 2000/2001 financial year was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew (date of birth: 30/05/91) at 17% for the entire year
Ÿ Gregory (date of birth: 21/12/88) at 18% for the entire year; and,
Ÿ Alison (date of birth: 06/03/87) at 13% for the entire year.
6. As the Applicant's annual income was below $28,200, he was entitled to the full rate of Family Tax Benefit Part A (Annexure C, p. 3).
7. The rate of Family Tax Benefit Part A payable to the Applicant, for Matthew, Gregory and Alison, throughout the 2000/2001 financial year was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew - under 13 years rate at $116.20 per fortnight or $8.3 per day (Annexure C, p. 3)
Ÿ Gregory - under 13 years rate at $116.20 per fortnight or $8.3 per day (Annexure C, p. 3)
Ÿ Alison - 13-15 years rate at $147.28 per fortnight or $10.52 per day (Annexure C, p. 3)
8. The 2000/2001 financial year comprised of 365 days. Having regard to this and the percentage of time the Applicant cared for his children, his entitlement to Family Tax Benefit Part A for the children was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew - $8.3 per day x 17% x 365 days = $515.02
Ÿ Gregory - $8.3 per day x 18% x 365 days = $545.31
Ÿ Alison - $10.52 per day x 13% x 365 days = $499.17
The Applicant was entitled to a total amount of $1559.50 in Family Tax Benefit Part A for Matthew, Gregory and Alison.
9. The Applicant was also entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part B, in the amount of
$69.58 per fortnight or $4.97 per day, as he had at least one dependent child, under
the age of 16 years in his care (Annexure C, p. 5). The percentage of Family Tax
benefit Part B used to calculate the entitlement is the highest percentage assigned to
a child when there is more than one child under the age of 16 years, in this case being
18% for Gregory.10. The rate of Family Tax Benefit Part B payable to the Applicant was:
Ÿ $4.97 per day x 365 days x 18% = $326.53
11. The Respondent contends the Applicant was entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part A and Family Tax Benefit Part B for the 2000/2001 financial year in the amount of $1886.03 (that is, $1559.50 [Family Tax Benefit Part A]+ $326.53 [Family Tax Benefit Part B]).
12. The Respondent submits from 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001, the Applicant was paid a total of $3046.97 in Family Tax Benefit Part A and Family Tax Benefit Part B (Annexure B, pp. 1-5).
13. The Applicant received more than the correct amount of Family Tax Benefits. More specifically, the Respondent was overpaid $1160.94 ($3046.97 [amount received] - $1886.03 [amount entitled). An automatic waiver of $1000 applied to this debt as a result of the tolerance waiver that applied to debts pertaining to the 2000/2001 financial year. As a result, the Respondent contends, for the 2000/2001 financial year there was a debt, due to the Commonwealth, in the amount of $160.94 and this amount has been recovered.
Family Tax Benefit Calculations for 2001/2002 financial year
14. The percentage of time the Applicant had the three children in his care in the 2001/2002 financial year was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew at 17% for the entire year
Ÿ Gregory at 18% for the entire year; and,
Ÿ Alison at 13% for the entire year.
15 As the Applicant's annual income was below the amount of $29,857 , he was entitled to be paid the full rate of Family Tax Benefit Part A (Annexure D, p. 2).
16. The rate of Family Tax Benefit Part A payable to the Applicant for Matthew, Gregory and Alison, throughout the 2001/2002 financial year was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew - under 13 years rate at $122.92 per fortnight or $8.78 per day (Annexure D, p. 2).
Ÿ Gregory - under 13 years rate at $122.92 per fortnight or $8.78 per day from 1 July 2001 to 20 December 2001 (Annexure D, p. 2)
Ÿ Gregory - 13-15 years rate at $155.82 per fortnight or $11.13 per day from 21 December 2001 (Annexure D, p. 2) as Gregory turned 13 years old on 21 December 2001.
Ÿ Alison - 13-15 years rate at $155.82 or $11.13 per day
17. The 2001/2002 financial year comprised of 365 days. There were 173 calendar days from 1 July 2001 to 20 December 2001 and 192 days from 21 December 2001 to 30 June 2002. Having regard to this and the percentage of time the Applicant cared for his children, his entitlement to Family Tax Benefit Part A for Matthew, Gregory and Alison was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew - $8.78 per day x 17% x 365 days = $544.80
Ÿ Gregory - $8.78 per day x 18% x 173 days = $273.41
Ÿ Gregory - $11.13 per day x 18% x 192 days = $384.65
Ÿ Alison - $11.13 x 13% x 365 days = $528.12
The Applicant was therefore entitled to a total amount of $1730.98 in Family Tax Benefit Part A for Matthew, Gregory and Alison.
18. The Applicant was also entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part B, in the amount of
$73.64 per fortnight or $5.26 per day, as he had at least one child aged under 16 years (Annexure D, p. 4).19. The rate of Family Tax Benefit Part B payable to the Applicant was:
Ÿ $5.26 per day x 365 days x 18% = $345.58
20. The Respondent contends, for the 2001/2002 financial year the Applicant was entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part A and Family Tax Benefit Part B in the amount of $2076.56 (that is, $1730.98[Total Family Tax Benefit Part A] + $345.58 [Total Family Tax Benefit Part B].
21. The Respondent maintains from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002, the Applicant was paid a total of $1881.19 (that includes an arrears payment of $1.48 for the period 21 December 2001 to 24 December 2001) in Family Tax Benefit Part A and Family Tax Benefit Part B (Annexure B, pp.6-10). From this, deductions totaling $188.57 were made which represented repayments for an existing debt. As a result, the Applicant actually received a total of $1692.62 in Family Tax Benefits.
22. The Respondent asserts, excluding any deductions, the Applicant received less than the correct amount of Family Tax Benefit in the 2001/2002 tax year. In fact, the Applicant was underpaid $195.37 ($1881.19 [amount received] - $2076.56 [amount entitled]) in Family payments.
23. The Respondent therefore submits, there is no debt relevant to the 2001/2002 financial year.
Family Tax Benefit calculations for 2002/2003 financial year
24. The percentage of time the Applicant had the children in his care in the 2002/2003 financial year was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew at 19% for the entire financial year
Ÿ Gregory at 19% for the entire financial year
Ÿ Alison at 13% for part of the financial year
25. As the Applicant's annual income was below the amount of $30,806, he was entitled to the full rate of Family Tax Benefit Part A (Annexure E, p. 2).
26. The rate of Family Tax Benefit Part A payable to the Applicant for Matthew, Gregory and Alison, throughout the 2002/2003 financial year was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew - under 13 years rate at $126.70 per fortnight or $9.05 per day (Annexure E, p. 2).
Ÿ Gregory - 13 - 15 years rate at $160.72 per fortnight or $11.48 per day: and,
Ÿ Alison - 13- 15 years rate at $160.72 per fortnight or $11.48 per day from 1 July 2002 to 5 March 2003 as on the 6 March 2003 she turned 16 years of age and was granted Youth Allowance in her own right. The result of this was Family Payments ceased to became payable to the Applicant.
27. The 2002/2003 financial year was made up of 365 days. There were 248 days from 1 July 2002 to 5 March 2003. Having regard to this and the percentage of time the Applicant cared for the children, his entitlement to Family Tax Benefit Part A for Matthew, Gregory and Alison was as follows:
Ÿ Matthew - $9.05 x 19% x 365 days = $627.62
Ÿ Gregory - $11.48 x 19% x 365 days = $796.14
Ÿ Alison (from 1 July 2002 to 5 March 2003) - $11.48 x 13% x 248 days
= $370.12
28. The Applicant was therefore entitled to a total amount of $1,793.88 in Family Tax Benefit Part A for Matthew, Gregory and Alison.
29. The Applicant was also entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part B, in the amount of
$75.88 per fortnight or $5.42 per day, as he had at least one child under 16 years in
his care (Annexure E, p. 4).
30. The rate of Family Tax Benefit Part B payable to the Applicant was:
Ÿ $5.42 x 365 days x 19% = $375.89
31. The respondent therefore contends, for the 2002/2003 financial year, the Applicant was entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part A and Family Tax Benefit Part B in the amount of $2169.77 (that is, $1793.88 [total Family Tax Benefit Part A] + $375.89 [total Family Tax Benefit Part B]).
32. The Respondent maintains that from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003, the Applicant was paid a total of $2,168.92 (that includes an arrears payment of $125.08 for 1 July 2002 to 14 October 2002) in Family Tax Benefit Part A and Family Tax Benefit Part B (Annexure B, pp.11-16). From this deductions totaling $423.87 were made. Arrears payments (relevant to past years) in the amount of $290.65 as well as additional payments totaling $917.80 were also made.
33. The total amount of actual payments received by the Applicant was therefore:
Ÿ (Total FTB Part A and Part B) + (Total Arrears relevant to past years) + (Total Additional Payments Made) - (Total Withholdings)
$2168.92 + $290.65 + $917.80 - $423.87 = $2,953.50
34. Where only Family Tax Benefit Part A and Family Tax Benefit Part B is concerned, Centrelink records show the Applicant received $2,168.92. He was entitled to $2169.77. The Respondent therefore asserts, the Applicant received less than the correct amount of Family Tax Benefits, in the amount of $0.85 ($2,168.92 [Family Tax Benefit Part A and Part B received] - $2169.77 [Family Tax Benefit Part A and Part B entitlement]).
35. It is therefore a contention of the Respondent, for the 2002/2003 financial year there
is no debt.Amounts Owed
36. The Applicant was entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part A and Part B as follows for the 2000/2001, 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 tax years:
Ÿ 2000/2001 - $1886.03
Ÿ 2001/2002 - $2076.56
Ÿ 2002/2003 - $2169.75
Ÿ Total - $6132.34
37. For the financial year 2000/2001, the Applicant received $3046.97 in Family payments.
38. In the 2001/2002 tax year, after considering any deductions made, an amount of $1,692.62 was received by the Applicant in family payments.
39. Having regard to withholdings, arrears and additional payments made to the Applicant in the 2002/2003 financial year, the Applicant received $2,953.50 in family payments.
40. It is therefore submitted, the Applicant received payments totaling $7693.09 in the 2000/2001, 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 financial years.
41. The Respondent provides, that in total, the Applicant was overpaid $1560.75 ($7693.09 [payments received] - $6132.34 [entitled payment]).
42. As the $1000 transitional waiver applied to the 2000/2001 tax year's overpayment, the Applicant is said to have been overpaid $560.75.
43. From 1 July 2003 to 31 January 2005, Centrelink withheld $589.96 from the Applicant's entitlement to Family Tax Benefit (Annexure B, pp 17-18).
44. The Respondent contends that as the amount withheld ($589.96) is more than the amount overpaid ($560.75) the difference ought to be refunded to the Applicant. The refundable amount is $29.21, and ought to be paid by the Respondent to the Applicant
Order Sought
The respondent respectfully requests this Tribunal vary the decision of the SSAT, made on 9 June 2004, and in doing so determine:
i) there is a debt for the 2000/2001 tax year, in the amount of $162.77 and this amount has been recovered;
ii) there is no debt for the 2001/2002 financial year;
iii) there is no debt for the 2002/2003 financial year; and,
iv) an amount of $29.21, over-recovered is to be paid to the Applicant by the Respondent.
Andrea Garcia
(for the Secretary)16 March 2005
Family Tax Benefit paid to Mr Logue
1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001
(as per Centrelink records)*The information contained in this table was derived from Annexure "Aa"
Fortnightly Period Amount of FTB Part A and Part B paid to Mr Logue Deductions made to FTB
(Family Tax Benefit Witholdings for repayment of debt)Arrears of FTB made to Mr Logue Additional Payments /reissued payments made 01/07//00 to 11/07/00 FTB Part A: $77.57
FTB Part B: $14.21Total FTB Part A and Part B: $91.78
nil
nil
nil
12/07/00 to 25/07/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
26/07/00 to 08/08/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
09/08/00 to 22/08/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil nil
nil
23/08/00 to 05/09/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
06/09/00 to 19/09/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
20/09/00 to 03/10/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
04/10/00 to 17/10/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
18/10/00 to 31/10/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
01/11/00 to 13/11/00 FTB Part A: $91.67
FTB Part B: $16.80Total FTB Part A and Part B: $108.47
nil
nil
nil
14/11/00 to 27/11/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
28/11/00 to 11/12/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
12/12/00 to 25/12/00 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
26/12/00 to 08/01/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
09/01/01 to 22/01/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
23/01/01 to 05/02/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
06/02/01 to 19/02/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
20/02/01 to 05/03/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
06/03/01 to 19/03/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
20/03/01 to 02/04/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
03/04/01 to 16/04/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
17/04/01 to 30/04/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
01/05/01 to 14/05/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
15/05/01 to 28/05/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
29/05/01 to 11/06/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
12/06/01 to 25/06/01 FTB Part A: $98.72
FTB Part B: $18.09Total FTB Part A and Part B: $116.81
nil
nil
nil
26/06/01 to 30/06/01 FTB Part A: $36.57
FTB Part B: $6.71Total FTB Part A and Part B: $43.28
nil
nil
nil
Total FTB Part A paid: $2575.09
Total FTB Part B paid: $471.88Total FTB Part A and Part B paid/received: $3046.97
Family Tax Benefit paid to Mr Logue
1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002
(as per Centrelink records)*The information contained in this table was derived from Annexure "Ab"
Fortnightly Period
Amount of FTB Part A and Part B
paid to Mr Logue
(and other information)Deductions made to FTB
(Family Tax Benefit Witholdings for repayment of debt)Arrears of FTB made to Mr Logue
Additonal Payments/Reissued Payments made 01/07/01 to 09/07/01 FTB Part A: $36.57
FTB Part B: $12.08Total FTB A and FTB B: $48.65
nil
nil
nil
10/07/01 to 23/07/01 FTB Part A: $104.44
FTB Part B: $19.18Total FTB A and FTB B: $123.62
nil
nil
nil
24/07/01 to 06/08/01 FTB Part A: $40.18
FTB Part B: $7.42Total FTB A and FTB B: $47.60
nil
nil
nil
07/08/01 to 20/08/01 FTB Part A: $40.18
FTB Part B: $7.42Total FTB A and FTB B: $47.60
nil
nil
nil
21/08/01 to 03/09/01 FTB Part A: $40.18
FTB Part B: $7.42Total FTB A and FTB B: $47.60
nil
nil
nil
04/09/01 to 17/09/01 FTB Part A: $40.18
FTB Part B: $7.42Total FTB A and FTB B: $47.60
nil
nil
nil
01/07/01 to 17/09/01 FTB Part A: $78.21
FTB Part B: $24.49Total FTB A and FTB B: $102.70
nil
nil
nil
18/09/01 to 01/10/01 FTB Part A:$ 54.04
FTB Part B:$ 11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $65.80
nil
nil
nil
02/10/01 to 15/10/01 FTB Part A: $54.04
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $65.80
nil
nil
nil
16/10/01 to 29/10/01 FTB Part A: $54.04
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $65.80
nil
nil
nil
30/10/01 to 12/11/01 FTB Part A: $54.04
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $65.80
nil
nil
nil
13/11/01 to 26/11/01 FTB Part A: $54.04
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $65.80
nil
nil
nil
27/11/01 to 10/12/01 FTB Part A: $54.04
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $65.80
nil
nil
nil
11/12/01 to 24/12/01 FTB Part A: $54.04
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $65.80
nil
nil
nil
21/12/01 to 24/12/01 nil
FTB Part A: $1.48 nil
25/12/01 to 07/01/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
nil
nil
nil
08/01/02 to 21/01/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
nil
nil
nil
22/01/02 to 04/02/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
nil
nil
nil
05/02/02 to 18/02/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
nil
nil
nil
19/02/02 to 04/03/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
05/03/02 to 18/03/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
19/03/02 to 01/04/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
02/04/02 to 15/04/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
16/04/02 to 29/04/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
30/04/02 to 13/05/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
14/05/02 to 27/05/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
28/05/02 to 10/06/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
11/06/02 to 24/06/02 FTB Part A: $59.22
FTB Part B: $11.76Total FTB A and FTB B: $70.98
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
25/06/02 to 30/06/02 FTB Part A: $25.86
FTB Part B: $5.14Total FTB A and FTB B: $31.00
Withholding: $8.57 nil
nil
Total FTB Part A: $1553.94
Total FTB Part B: $325.77Total FTB Part A + FTB Part B: $1879.71
Total arrears: $1.48
Total Withholdings - $188.57
Total FTB Part A + Total FTB Part B + Total arrears - Total Withholdings = Total Amount Received
$1879.71 + $1.48 - $188.57 = $1692.62Family Tax Benefit paid to Mr Logue
1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003
(as per Centrelink records)*The information contained in this table was derived from Annexure "Ac"
Fortnightly Period Amount of FTB Part A and Part B paid to Mr Logue (and other information) Deductions made to FTB
(Family Tax Benefit Withholdings for repayment of debt)Arrears of FTB made to Mr Logue Additional payments/ reissued payments made
01/07/02 to 08/07/02 FTB Part A: $34.48
FTB Part B: $ 6.86Total FTB Part A and Part B: $41.34
Withholding: $11.43 nil
nil
09/07/02 to 22/07/02 FTB Part A: $61.18
FTB Part B: $12.18Total FTB Part A and Part B: $73.36
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
23/07/02 to 05/08/02 FTB Part A: $61.18
FTB Part B: $12.18Total FTB Part A and Part B: $73.36
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
06/08/02 to 19/08/02 FTB Part A: $61.18
FTB Part B: $12.18Total FTB Part A and Part B: $73.36
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
20/08/02 to 02/09/02 FTB Part A: $61.18
FTB Part B: $ 12.18Total FTB Part A and Part B: $73.36
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
03/09/02 to 16/09/02 FTB Part A: $61.18
FTB Part B: $12.18Total FTB Part A and Part B: $73.36
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
17/09/02 to 30/09/02 FTB Part A: $61.18
FTB Part B: $12.18Total FTB Part A and Part B: $73.36
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
01/10/02 to 14/10/02 FTB Part A: $61.18
FTB Part B: $12.18Total FTB Part A and Part B: $73.36
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
01/07/02 to 14/10/02 nil
nil
FTB Part A: $108.12
FTB Part B: $16.96Total FTB Part A and Part B: $125.08
nil
15/10/02 to 28/10/02 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
01/07/00 to 30/06/02 nil
nil
nil
Reissue: $872.86 29/10/02 to 11/11/02 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
nil
nil
nil
12/11/02 to 25/11/02 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
nil
nil
nil
26/11/02 to 09/12/02 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
10/12/02 to 23/12/02 FTB Part A:$75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
24/12/02 to 06/01/03 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
Withholding: $20.00 nil
nil
07/01/03 to 20/01/03 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
nil
nil
nil
21/01/03 to 03/02/03 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
nil
nil
nil
04/02/03 to 17/02/03 FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
Withholding: $22.47
Reissue: $22.47 18/02/03 to 03/03/03
18/02/03 to 03/03/03
01/07/01 to 30/06/02
FTB Part A: $75.46
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $89.88
Withholding: $22.47 FTB Part A: $170.20
FTB Part B: $40.15Total FTB Part A and Part B: $210.35
Reissue: $22.47
04/03/03 to 17/03/03 FTB Part A: $57.58
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $72.00
Withholding: $18.00 nil
nil
01/07/01 to 30/06/02 nil
nil
FTB Part A: $80.30 nil
18/03/03 to 31/03/03 FTB Part A: $54.60
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $69.02
Withholding: $17.25 nil
nil
01/04/03 to 14/04/03 FTB Part A: $54.60
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $69.02
Withholding: $17.25 nil
nil
15/04/03 to 28/04/03 FTB Part A: $54.60
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $69.02
Withholding: $17.25 nil
nil
29/04/03 to 12/05/03 FTB Part A: $54.60
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $69.02
Withholding: $17.25 nil
nil
13/05/03 to 26/05/03 FTB Part A: $54.60
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $69.02
Withholding: $17.25 nil
nil
27/05/03 to 09/06/03 FTB Part A: $54.60
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $69.02
Withholding: $17.25 nil
nil
10/06/03 to 23/06/03 FTB Part A: $54.60
FTB Part B: $14.42Total FTB Part A and Part B: $69.02
Withholding: $17.25 nil
nil
24/06/03 to 30/06/03 FTB Part A: $27.72
FTB Part B: $7.32Total FTB Part A and Part B: $35.04
Withholding: $8.75 nil
nil
Total FTB Part A - $1684.84
Total FTB Part B - $359.00
Total FTB Part A + B - $2043.84Total Withholdings - $423.87
Total Arrears Paid - $415.73
Total Additional Payments Made - $917.80
Total FTB Part A and B +Total Arrears + Total Additional Payments Made - Total Withholdings = Total Amount received
$2043.84 + $415.73 + $917.80 - $423.87 = $2953.50
Withholdings and Additional Payments/Reissued Payments made to Mr Logue
1 July 2003 to 31 January 2005
(as per Centrelink records)*The information contained in this table was derived from Annexure "Ad"
Fortnightly period Deductions made to FTB
(Family Tax Benefit Withholdings for repayment of debt)01/07/03 to 07/07/03 $$8.75 08/07/03 to 21/07/03 $$17.78 22/07/03 to 04/08/03 $$17.78 05/08/03 to 18/08/03 $$17.78 19/08/03 to 01/09/03 $$17.78 02/09/03 to 15/09/03 $$17.78 16/09/03 to 29/09/03 $$17.78 30/09/03 to 13/10/03 $$17.78 14/10/03 to 27/10/03 $$17.78 28/10/03 to 10/11/03 $$17.78 11/11/03 to 24/11/03 $$17.78 25/11/03 to 08/12/03 $$17.78 09/12/03 to 22/12/03 $$17.78 23/12/03 to 05/01/04 $$17.78 06/01/04 to 19/01/04 $$17.78 20/01/04 to 02/02/04 $$17.78 03/02/04 to 16/02/04 $$17.78 17/02/04 to 01/03/04 $$17.78 02/03/04 to 15/03/04 $$17.78 16/03/04 to 29/03/04 $$17.78 30/03/04 to 12/04/04 $$17.78 13/04/04 to 26/04/04 $$17.78 27/04/04 to 10/05/04 $$17.78 11/05/04 to 24/05/04 $$17.78 25/05/04 to 07/06/04 $$18.83 08/06/04 to 21/06/04 $$19.42 22/06/04 to 05/07/04 $$19.58 06/07/04 to 19/07/04 $$19.88 20/07/04 to 02/08/04 $$19.88 03/08/04 to 16/08/04 $$19.88 17/08/04 to 30/08/04 $$19.88 31/08/04 to 13/09/04 $$19.88 14/09/04 to 27/09/04 $$15.04 28/09/04 to 11/10/04 nil 12/10/04 to 25/10/04 nil 26/10/04 to 08/11/04 nil 09/11/04 to 22/11/04 nil 23/11/04 to 06/12/04 nil 07/12/04 to 20/12/04 nil 21/12/04 to 03/01/05 nil 04/01/05 to 17/01/05 nil 18/01/05 to 31/01/05 nil Total Deductions made to FTB from 1 July 2003 to 31 January 2005: $589.96
0
0
0