[2013] FWCA 2085 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Logic Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/683)
LOGIC SERVICES PTY LTD ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 8 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the Logic Services Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Logic Services Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400641 PR535434>
- AGLC
- Logic Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 2085
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2085
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the arguments presented by both the applicant and the objectors to the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement was necessary to regulate the employment of workers at the mine and that it was in the public interest. The Commission also found that the agreement was likely to have a significant impact on the wages, conditions, and terms of employment of workers in the industry. However, the Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and would provide for the efficient operation of the mine.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Logic Services Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013. The Commission found that the agreement was in the public interest and would provide for the efficient operation of the mine. The Commission also found that the agreement was fair and reasonable and would not have an adverse impact on the wages, conditions, or terms of employment of workers in the industry. The Commission's approval of the agreement was based on its consideration of the evidence presented by both the applicant and the objectors, and its assessment of the agreement's potential impact on the industry and the public interest.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.