Lodygensky (Migration)

[2022] AATA 1789

Lodygensky (Migration) [2022] AATA 1789 (9 June 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Nicolas Lodygensky

CASE NUMBER:  1911169

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2018/3114471

MEMBER:C. Packer

DATE:9 June 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

·cl 186.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 9 June 2022 at 7:42pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa – Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) – temporary residence transition stream – carpenter – subject of approved position nomination – refusal of related nomination application set aside on review – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 188.223(2)

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 24 April 2019 to refuse to grant the applicant an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 17 August 2018. At the time of application, Class EN contained one subclass: Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme). The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 186 visa are set out in Part 186 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the ‘Common criteria’, as well as the criteria of one of three alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, the Direct Entry stream, or the Labour Agreement stream.

3. In the present case, the applicant is seeking the visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream, to work in the nominated position of carpenter.

4. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

   Nomination of a position

5. Clause 186.223 as applicable in this case is set out in full in the attachment to this decision. Essentially, it requires that the position to which the application relates is the subject of an application for approval of a nomination in the Temporary Residence Transition stream that identifies the visa applicant. The position must be the one that was the subject of the declaration that was required to be made as part of the current visa application.

6. On 9 June 2022 the Tribunal in case 1909054 approved the nomination by Skilled Carpenters Services Pty Ltd.

7. Therefore, cl 186.223(2) is met. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

   DECISION

8. The Tribunal remits the application for an Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa:

   ·cl 186.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

   C. Packer
   Member

   
   

   ATTACHMENT A

   186.223(1)     The position to which the application relates is the position:

   (a)nominated in an application for approval that:

   (i)identifies the applicant in relation to the position; and

   (ii)is made in relation to a visa in a Temporary Residence Transition stream; and

   (c)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114B(3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

   (2)     The Minister has approved the nomination.

   (3)     The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn.

   (3A)    Either:

   (a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

   (b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

   (4)     The position is still available to the applicant.

   (5)     The application for the visa is made no more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.