QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
Local Realtors (Qld) Pty Ltd v Williamson [2022] QCATA 173
PARTIES: localrealtors (qld) pty ltd t/as local realtors (appellant)
v
Troy Williamson (respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
APL300-21
ORIGINATING APPLICATION NO/S:
MCDT70-21
MATTER TYPE:
Appeals
DELIVERED ON:
4 November 2022
HEARING DATE:
25 October 2022
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Member Richard Oliver
ORDERS: 1. Leave to appeal is granted.
2. The decision of the tribunal date 21 October 2021 in MCDT70-21 is set aside.
3. In lieu thereof it is ordered that applicant is to pay the respondent the sum of $1,267.20.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – RIGHT OF APPEAL – WHEN APPEAL LIES – FINDINGS OF FACT – where tenancy terminated because of objectionable behaviour – where applicant claimed outstanding rental and other costs in respect of a tenancy on termination – where the respondent counter-claimed for costs of accommodation, storage and kennel fees – whether the respondent was in arrears of rent – whether the costs of cleaning and change of locks was reasonable or necessary – whether it was reasonable for the respondent to vacate the premises while waiting for application for termination to be heard – whether compensation for alternate accommodation, storage and kennel cost were reasonably incurred – whether the findings of the tribunal at first instance open on the evidence –– whether any basis to interfere with findings of fact ––whether grounds for a grant of leave – whether any error of law or fact demonstrated.
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act sections 28, 29 and 142(3)(a)(i)
Residential Tenancy and Rooming Accommodation Act ss 313, 362, 419, 420 and 429
Terera & Anor v Clifford [2017] QCA 181.
Robinson Helicopter Company Incorporated v McDermott [2016] HCA 22.
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
The parties appeared in person
Background
The respondent, Mr Williamson and his then co-tenant Ms Ryan, entered into a residential tenancy agreement with the applicant, as managing agent, in respect of a rental house in Hemmant in January 2021. The agreement provided for weekly rental of $780.00/wk and was for a term of 12 months. An initial bond of $3,120 was paid.
The tenants had issues with the representative of the applicant, Mr Stebbings, and ultimately Ms Ryan moved out of the tenancy. Half the bond was repaid to her. That left Mr Williamson with the tenancy alone. The conflict continued with the applicant alleging Mr Williamson was in arrears of rent. This was in fact the case.
On 17 April 2021, the applicant gave Mr Williams a Notice to Remedy Breach for rental arrears. There is no dispute that he was in arrears at the time, even though a rental bond was with the Residential Tenancy Authority as security for rent and other expenses. When Mr Williamson failed to remedy the breach the applicant gave him a Notice to Leave. The date to vacate the premises pursuant to the Notice to Leave was 29 April 2021.
To avoid this being…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Local Realtors (Qld) Pty Ltd v Williamson and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] QCATA 173
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the respondent was in arrears of rent, if the costs of cleaning and changing locks were reasonable and necessary, if it was reasonable for the respondent to vacate the premises while waiting for the application for termination to be heard, and if the compensation for alternate accommodation, storage, and kennel costs were reasonably incurred. Additionally, the court had to determine if the findings of the tribunal at first instance were open on the evidence, if there was any basis to interfere with the findings of fact, and if there were any grounds for a grant of leave. The court also had to assess if any error of law or fact was demonstrated.
The court held that the tribunal had erred in fact and law in its assessment of the costs of cleaning and changing locks, as the tribunal had failed to take into account the evidence of the condition of the premises at the time of termination. The court found that the costs of cleaning and changing locks were reasonable and necessary, and the respondent was in arrears of rent. The court also found that it was reasonable for the respondent to vacate the premises while waiting for the application for termination to be heard, and that the compensation for alternate accommodation, storage, and kennel costs were reasonably incurred. Therefore, the court set aside the decision of the tribunal and ordered that the applicant is to pay the respondent the sum of $1,267.20.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Leave to appeal is granted.
2. The decision of the tribunal date 21 October 2021 in MCDT70-21 is set aside.
3. In lieu thereof it is ordered that applicant is to pay the respondent the sum of $1,267.20.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.