Lloyd Harris v Peter Tighe

Case

[2003] FCA 738

22 JULY 2003


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Lloyd Harris v Peter Tighe [2003] FCA 738

LLOYD HARRIS v PETER TIGHE & ORS

V354 OF 2003

MARSHALL J
22 JULY 2003
MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V354 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

LLOYD HARRIS
APPLICANT

AND:

PETER TIGHE (and others according to the Schedule of Respondents hereto)
RESPONDENTS

JUDGE:

MARSHALL J

DATE OF ORDER:

22 JULY 2003

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

The rule to show cause granted on 6 May 2003 be discharged.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

SCHEDULE OF RESPONDENTS

PETER TIGHE First Respondent
BERNIE RIORDAN Second Respondent
JAMES MacFADYEN Third Respondent
JOHN DORAN Fourth Respondent
DEAN MIGHELL Fifth Respondent
RICHARD WILLIAMS Sixth Respondent
ROBERT GERAGHTY Seventh Respondent
WILLIAM GAME Eighth Respondent
EARL SETCHES NinthRespondent
STEVE McCARNEY Tenth Respondent
GARY JACOBSEN Eleventh Respondent
JORGEN GULLESTRUP Twelfth Respondent
NIGEL LEAN Thirteenth Respondent
MIKE MITCHELL Fourteenth Respondent
TONY MURPHY Fifteenth Respondent
BRIAN O’REILLY Sixteenth Respondent
JOE GATTO Seventeenth Respondent
STEVE MASON Eighteenth Respondent
NOEL PAUL Nineteenth Respondent
PETER MILLER Twentieth Respondent
BRIAN BAULK Twenty-First Respondent
COLIN COOPER Twenty-Second Respondent
DAVID IRONS Twenty-Third Respondent
SHARELLE HERRINGTON Twenty-Fourth Respondent
DEBORAH HARRIS Twenty-Fifth Respondent
NOEL BRETAG Twenty-Sixth Respondent
LAURIE CHALKER Twenty-Seventh Respondent
JIM METCHER Twenty-Eighth Respondent
IAN McCARTHY Twenty-Ninth Respondent
VIVETTE HORREX Thirtieth Respondent
JOHN BROWN Thirty-First Respondent
BURT BLACKBURNE Thirty-Second Respondent
DOREEN McDONALD Thirty-Third Respondent
PAUL WHITE Thirty-Fourth Respondent
GERRY KANDELAARS Thirty-Fifth Respondent
PAUL KELLY Thirty-Sixth Respondent
GARY CARSON Thirty-Seventh Respondent
BARRY RISELEY Thirty-Eighth Respondent
DAN DWYER Thirty-Ninth Respondent
G ROBINS Fortieth Respondent
L WALKINGTON Forty-First Respondent
L HARRIS Forty-Second Respondent
D EVANS Forty-Third Respondent
L EINFUSS Forty-Fourth Respondent
M SWAN Forty-Fifth Respondent
S MASON Forty-Sixth Respondent
H McMULLAN Forty-Seventh Respondent
P DOHERTY Forty-Eighth Respondent
L COOPER Forty-Ninth Respondent
G RAYNER Fiftieth Respondent
G ENZON Fifty-First Respondent
M ETUE Fifty-Second Respondent
R WILDE Fifty-Third Respondent
N TAYLOR Fifty-Fourth Respondent
L BRITAIN Fifty-Fifth Respondent
S DODD Fifty-Sixth Respondent
B CLARKE Fifty-Seventh Respondent
G CUMMING Fifty-Eighth Respondent
N REID Fifty-Ninth Respondent
K MELLIS Sixtieth Respondent
R STEER Sixty-First Respondent
C THIELE Sixty-Second Respondent
B DOBSON Sixty-Third Respondent
N PAUL Sixty-Fourth Respondent
P McDONALD Sixty-Fifth Respondent
B WATKINS Sixty-Sixth Respondent
P MILLER Sixty-Seventh Respondent
M SUMNER Sixty-Eighth Respondent
D KENNA Sixty-Ninth Respondent

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V354 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

LLOYD HARRIS
APPLICANT

AND:

PETER TIGHE (and others according to the Schedule of Respondents hereto)
RESPONDENTS

JUDGE:

MARSHALL J

DATE:

22 JULY 2003

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. These reasons for judgment should be read together with the reasons for judgment in CEPU v Harris [2003] FCA 737 which was published immediately before the publication of these reasons.

  2. The rule to show cause in this matter would have been made absolute but for the validation order made in CEPU v Harris.  Consequently it is appropriate to order that the rule to show cause be discharged.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Marshall.

Associate:

Dated:             22 July 2003

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Niall
Solicitor for the Applicant: Holding Redlich
Counsel for the 1st, 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 13th, 17th, 19th, 20th, 21st, 24th, 25th, 27th, 28th, 31st, 34th, 35th, 36th, 39th, 40th, 47th, 50th to 66th and 68th Respondents: Mr R Kenzie QC with Ms C Howell
Solicitor for the1st, 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 13th, 17th, 19th, 20th, 21st, 24th, 25th, 27th, 28th, 31st, 34th, 35th, 36th, 39th, 40th, 47th, 50th to 66th and 68th Respondents: Slater & Gordon
Date of Hearing: 18 and 19 June 2003
Completion of Written Submissions 7 July 2003
Date of Judgment: 22 July 2003
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document