CITATION: Livadaru v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2008] NSWADT 160 DIVISION: General Division PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
Camelia Codruta Livadaru
Commissioner of Police, NSW Police ForceFILE NUMBER: 083037 HEARING DATES: 14 May 2008 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 14 May 2008
DATE OF DECISION:
2 June 2008BEFORE: Handley R - Deputy President CATCHWORDS: Firearms Act - firearms licence - revocation of licence or permit MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED: Firearms Act 1996
Firearms Regulation 2006CASES CITED: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321
Bazouni and ors v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2002] NSWADT 100
Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9
Ward v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 28
Hocking v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2002] NSWADT 214
Hughes & Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127
McBride v Walton (NSW Court of Appeal, unreported, 15 July 1994)REPRESENTATION: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
M Coroneos, barrister
M Thangaraj, barristerORDERS: 1. The Commissioner’s decision to revoke Ms Livadaru’s category AB firearms licence is set aside and a decision substituted reinstating that licence
2. The Commissioner’s decision to revoke Ms Livadaru’s firearms dealer licence is affirmed.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 On 31 January 2008, Camelia Livadaru applied to the Tribunal for the review of decisions of the Commissioner of Police (‘the Commissioner’) made under the Firearms Act 1996 (‘the Act’) to revoke her category AB firearms licence and her firearms dealer licence on the ground of the public interest.
Background
2 Ms Livadaru was born in Romania and migrated to Australia in 1989. She has been married for 13 years to Cezar Livadaru by whom she has three children aged nine, six and three years. Mr Livadaru is a house painter. Ms Livadaru has no criminal convictions and has never been charged with a criminal offence.
3 On 17 November 2000, Ms Livadaru was issued with a personal category AB firearms licence, which was renewed on 11 January 2006 with an expiry date of 11 January 2011. On 21 February 2006, Mr and Ms Livadaru registered the business name ‘Survival Arms’, the specified nature of the business being camping, fishing and hunting gear and accessories. On 9 April 2006, Ms Livadaru was issued with a firearms dealers licence for the business ‘Survival Arms’ with an expiry date of 9 April 2011. Ms Livadaru runs an online business under this name from her home in the Sydney suburb of Sadleir, selling firearms accessories and hunting, fishing and camping gear. In the course of this business, Ms Livadaru imports products from overseas, including, in 2007, some letter openers and telescopic stocks, which came to the attention of the Australian Customs Service (‘Customs”).
4 On 8 August 2007, Customs officers accompanied by the NSW Police Force, acting under the authority of a warrant, conducted a search of Mr and Ms Livadaru’s home at Sadleir and seized various items located there, including some white crystals, suspected…
Continue reading Livadaru v Commissioner of Police
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Livadaru v Commissioner of Police [2008] NSWADT 160
- Case
- [2008] NSWADT 160
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed in the case were whether the Commissioner's decision to revoke Ms Livadaru's firearms licences was lawful and whether the decision-making process complied with the relevant statutory requirements. Ms Livadaru argued that the Commissioner's decision was flawed due to procedural errors and that the evidence did not justify the revocation of her licences. The Commissioner, on the other hand, maintained that the revocation was necessary to ensure public safety and that the decision-making process was valid.
The court found that while the Commissioner's decision to revoke Ms Livadaru's firearms dealer licence was lawful, the decision to revoke her category AB firearms licence was not. The court held that the Commissioner had failed to properly consider relevant evidence and had made an error in concluding that Ms Livadaru was not a fit and proper person to hold a firearms licence. As a result, the court set aside the decision to revoke the category AB licence and substituted a decision reinstating the licence. However, the decision to revoke the firearms dealer licence was affirmed due to the significant breaches of the statutory requirements for holding such a licence.
The court's final orders were that the Commissioner's decision to revoke Ms Livadaru's category AB firearms licence was set aside, and a decision was substituted reinstating that licence. The decision to revoke her firearms dealer licence was affirmed. The court's decision highlights the importance of proper consideration of evidence and adherence to statutory requirements in decision-making processes involving firearms licences.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Commissioner's decision to revoke Ms Livadaru's category AB firearms licence is set aside and a decision substituted reinstating that licence 2. The Commissioner's decision to revoke Ms Livadaru's firearms dealer licence is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.