Liu v Samuel Homes Pty Ltd (No.2)

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Liu v Samuel Homes Pty Ltd (No.2) [2021] NSWCATCD 135
Hearing dates: On Papers
Date of orders: 18 October 2021
Decision date: 18 October 2021
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: J Ringrose, General member
Decision:

1.The respondent is to pay the applicant’s costs as agreed or failing agreement as assessed under Part 4.3 Division 7 of the Legal Profession Uniform Application Act 2014.

2.The costs agreed or assessed under order 1 shall be payable within 28 days of the agreement or assessment.

Catchwords:

COSTS – Whether there are “special circumstances” for the purposes of s.60(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 – Termination of costs payable.

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)

Legal Profession Uniform Application Act 2014 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Alexander James Pty Ltd v Pozetu Pty Ltd (No.2) [2016] NSWCATAP 75

Bostick Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No.2) [2009] NSWSCA 304

CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2017] NSWCA 280

CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/a The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015] NSWCATAP 21

Cripps v G&M Dawson [2006] NSWCA 84

GM Dawson Pty Ltd and Anor v Cripps and Anor [2006] NSWCA 81

Kelly v Noumenon Pty Ltd (1988) 47 SASR 182

Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59

Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120

Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Costs
Parties:

Leslie Liu (Applicant)

Samuel Homes Pty Ltd (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Bannermans Lawyers (Applicant)
File Number(s): HB 18/52002

reasons for decision

Background

  1. In November 2016 the applicant entered into a building contract with the respondent in respect of works to be undertaken at 18 Hollis Avenue Denniston East.

  2. An application for principal relief was filed on 28 November 2018 and the matter was heard on 29 November 2019, 28 February 2020, 14 May 2020, 6 August 2020, and 4 March 2021. On those various occasions the applicant was represented by his solicitors whilst solicitors and counsel appeared for the respondent up to 5 August 2020.

  3. On 28 July 2021 the Tribunal ordered that the respondent pay the applicant a sum of $342,660.79 within one month of the date of those orders. Further orders were made requiring a party seeking costs to provide written submissions and relevant evidence within 21 days of the date of the orders with the other party to provide their response within 42 days of the date of those orders.

  4. Submissions were received from the applicant on 31 August 2021 and no submissions in reply have been received from the respondent by the time submissions were formally closed on 30 September 2021, or at any time since that date.

Applicant’s submissions

  1. Mr Campbell of Bannermans Lawyers provided written submissions which were dated 23 August 2021. The applicant seeks orders that the respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed and he has argued that the claim for costs should follow the event as the applicant has been…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Liu v Samuel Homes Pty Ltd (No.2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWCATCD 135
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Liu v Samuel Homes Pty Ltd (No.2), the applicant, Mr Liu, sought a termination of costs payable order against the respondent, Samuel Homes Pty Ltd, as per section 60(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. The case involved a dispute concerning the termination of costs payable by the respondent to the applicant. The legal issues before the court included determining whether there were "special circumstances" that warranted the termination of costs payable under the relevant statutory provision.

The court examined the circumstances of the case to ascertain whether they met the criteria for "special circumstances" as required by section 60(2). The court considered various factors, including the conduct of the parties and the overall fairness of the case. In reaching its decision, the court applied the statutory provisions and relevant case law to evaluate the applicant's position. After careful deliberation, the court found that the circumstances did indeed constitute "special circumstances" warranting the termination of costs payable.

The court ordered that the respondent, Samuel Homes Pty Ltd, was to pay the applicant's costs as agreed or, if an agreement could not be reached, as assessed under the relevant provisions of the Legal Profession Uniform Application Act 2014. The costs were to be paid within 28 days of the agreement or assessment being finalised. This decision was grounded in the statutory provisions and the court's assessment of the particular circumstances of the case.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.The respondent is to pay the applicant’s costs as agreed or failing agreement as assessed under Part 4.3 Division 7 of the Legal Profession Uniform Application Act 2014.

2.The costs agreed or assessed under order 1 shall be payable within 28 days of the agreement or assessment.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.