| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
CITATION: | Litong v Blackmores Limited [2022] NSWPIC 237 |
| APPLICANT: | Concepcion Litong |
| RESPONDENT: | Blackmores Limited |
| MEMBER: | Catherine McDonald |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 24 May 2022 |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION- Lumbar spine injuries in 2012 and 2021; worker returned to normal duties; disease injury; consequential psychological condition; current work capacity; ability to earn in a range of suitable employment; Held– award for applicant for weekly compensation and section 60 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 expenses for which second insurer is liable. |
| DETERMINATIONS MADE: | 1. The applicant discontinues the claim for weekly compensation after 18 January 2022. 2. The Commission finds that a. the applicant suffered an injury to her lumbar spine which was the aggravation of a disease and that the deemed date of injury was 8 February 2021, and b. the applicant suffered a consequential psychological condition. 3. The Commission determines that the respondent is to pay the applicant: a. weekly compensation under s 37 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987: i. at a rate or rates to be agreed by the parties reflecting any loss of earnings in the period from 21 April 2021 to 27 August 2021, and ii. the rate of $210.40 per week from 28 August 2021 to 18 January 2022; b. section 60 expenses. 4. The parties have liberty to apply by email if they are unable to agree on the amount of weekly compensation payable, if any, between 21 April 2021 and 27 August 2021. |
STATEMENT OF REASONS
BACKGROUND
Conception Litong was employed by Blackmores Limited (Blackmores) as a machine operator. She claims that she suffered an injury to her lumbar spine, and a consequential psychological condition, as a result of the nature and conditions of her employment from 2011 to 8 February 2021 or that she suffered the aggravation of a disease with a deemed date of injury of 8 February 2021.
Blackmores was insured by QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited for all periods of Ms Litong’s employment up to 31 December 2017. The liabilities of that insurer are managed by GIO and I will refer to the manager of that part of the claim as GIO to avoid confusion.
During GIO’s period of risk, Ms Litong suffered a lumbar strain injury on 25 October 2021 for which she was paid compensation.
Since 1 January 2018, QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Limited has again been on risk for Blackmores and is referred to in the documents as QBE/icare. I will refer to it as QBE.
Each of the insurers says that the other is liable to pay any compensation to which Ms Litong is entitled and each disputes that there is sufficient evidence to find that she suffered a consequential psychological condition.
PROCEDURE
The claim was listed for conciliation conference and arbitration hearing on 3 March 2022 when Mr Moffet of counsel appeared for Ms Litong, Ms Compton of counsel appeared for GIO and Ms Goodman of counsel appeared for QBE.
The parties agreed that Ms Litong’s pre-injury average weekly…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Litong v Blackmores Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] NSWPIC 237
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the applicant’s current disease of the lumbar spine was attributable to his injuries sustained in 2012 and 2021. The court had to determine if the applicant’s current work capacity and ability to earn in suitable employment were impacted by the disease. Additionally, the court needed to ascertain the appropriate compensation and expenses to be awarded.
The court found that the applicant's current disease of the lumbar spine was attributable to the injuries he sustained in 2012 and 2021. It was concluded that his current work capacity and ability to earn in suitable employment were indeed impacted by the disease. The court awarded the applicant weekly compensation and section 60 expenses, for which the second insurer was found liable.
The court ordered that the applicant was to receive weekly compensation and section 60 expenses. The second insurer was held liable for these costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.