Lirantzis v Calligas

Case [2025] NSWCATCD 73


Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Lirantzis v Calligas [2025] NSWCATCD 73
Hearing dates: On the papers
Date of orders: 18 August 2025
Decision date: 18 August 2025
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: D Robertson, Principal Member
Decision:

(1) A hearing of the applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).

(2)     An extension of time to file the applicants’ reinstatement application is refused.

(3)     The applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dismissed.

Catchwords:

CIVIL PROCEDURE — Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Application for reinstatement — Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) s 55 — proceedings dismissed for non-appearance — previous application for reinstatement refused — second reinstatement application filed — extension of time to file reinstatement application — abuse of process — no new material to justify fresh consideration of second application — no basis for extension of time for filing of application

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) s 55

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2022 (NSW)

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Bobolas v Waverley Council [2016] NSWCA 139

GMT Construction Pty Ltd v Keshavarz [2024] NSWCATAP 68

Harmony Stone Gallery Pty Ltd v Ajuria [2017] NSWCATAP 80

Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22

JKB Holdings Pty Ltd v de la Vega [2013] NSWSC 501

MPP Property Pty Ltd v Soliman Hospitality Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 90

Sesay v Duran [2023] NSWCATAP 124

Wallace v Price [2017] NSWCATAP 151

Ward v Nand [2021] NSWCATAP 14

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Angela Lirantzis (First Applicant)
Maria Lirantzis (Second Applicant)
Peter Lirantzis (Third Applicant)
Petty Lirantzis (Fourth Applicant)
Christina Calligas (First Respondent)
Anastasios Calligas (Second Respondent)
Representation: Applicants (self-represented)
Minas & Associates (Respondents)
File Number(s): 2024/00327812
Publication restriction: Nil

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. The matter before me requiring determination is an Application for Reinstatement filed by the applicants in these proceedings on 11 August 2025. This is the second reinstatement application filed by the applicants. I will refer to the application filed on 11 August 2025 as the Second Reinstatement Application.

  2. The power of the Tribunal to reinstate proceedings arises from s 55(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) (NCAT Act). Section 55 provides:

55   Dismissal of proceedings

(1)  The Tribunal may dismiss at any stage any proceedings before it in any of the following circumstances—

(a)  if the applicant or appellant (or, if there is more than one applicant or appellant, each applicant or appellant) withdraws the application or appeal to which the proceedings relate,

(b)  if the Tribunal considers that the proceedings are frivolous or vexatious or otherwise misconceived or lacking in substance,

(c)  if the applicant or appellant (or, if there is more than one applicant or appellant, each applicant or appellant) has failed to appear in the proceedings,

(d)  if the Tribunal considers that there…

Continue reading Lirantzis v Calligas

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Lirantzis v Calligas [2025] NSWCATCD 73
Case
[2025] NSWCATCD 73
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Lirantzis v Calligas involves a dispute between the applicant, Lirantzis, and the respondent, Calligas, where the matter originated in the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (CAT). Lirantzis had previously appeared in the CAT but failed to appear for a hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the proceedings. A subsequent application for reinstatement was denied. Lirantzis then filed a second application for reinstatement, seeking to have the proceedings reinstated. The court was required to determine whether to grant an extension of time for the filing of the second reinstatement application and whether to reinstate the proceedings.

The court considered whether the second application for reinstatement was an abuse of process and whether there was any new material to justify the fresh consideration of the second application. The court found that the application for reinstatement was an abuse of process because it was the second such application. Furthermore, there was no new material presented that would warrant a fresh consideration of the application. Consequently, the court concluded that there was no basis for granting an extension of time for filing the second reinstatement application.

The court dismissed the second reinstatement application filed by Lirantzis. The court dispensed with a hearing for the application filed on 11 August 2025 and refused an extension of time to file the application. The court also dismissed the reinstatement application on the basis that it was an abuse of process and there was no new material to justify the fresh consideration of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) A hearing of the applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).

(2) An extension of time to file the applicants’ reinstatement application is refused.

(3) The applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.