Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lirantzis v Calligas [2025] NSWCATCD 73 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 18 August 2025 Decision date: 18 August 2025 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: D Robertson, Principal Member Decision: (1) A hearing of the applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
(2) An extension of time to file the applicants’ reinstatement application is refused.
(3) The applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dismissed.
Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Application for reinstatement — Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) s 55 — proceedings dismissed for non-appearance — previous application for reinstatement refused — second reinstatement application filed — extension of time to file reinstatement application — abuse of process — no new material to justify fresh consideration of second application — no basis for extension of time for filing of application
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) s 55
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2022 (NSW)
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Bobolas v Waverley Council [2016] NSWCA 139
GMT Construction Pty Ltd v Keshavarz [2024] NSWCATAP 68
Harmony Stone Gallery Pty Ltd v Ajuria [2017] NSWCATAP 80
Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22
JKB Holdings Pty Ltd v de la Vega [2013] NSWSC 501
MPP Property Pty Ltd v Soliman Hospitality Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 90
Sesay v Duran [2023] NSWCATAP 124
Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Angela Lirantzis (First Applicant)
Maria Lirantzis (Second Applicant)
Peter Lirantzis (Third Applicant)
Petty Lirantzis (Fourth Applicant)
Christina Calligas (First Respondent)
Anastasios Calligas (Second Respondent)Representation: Applicants (self-represented)
Minas & Associates (Respondents)
File Number(s): 2024/00327812 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
The matter before me requiring determination is an Application for Reinstatement filed by the applicants in these proceedings on 11 August 2025. This is the second reinstatement application filed by the applicants. I will refer to the application filed on 11 August 2025 as the Second Reinstatement Application.
-
The power of the Tribunal to reinstate proceedings arises from s 55(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) (NCAT Act). Section 55 provides:
55 Dismissal of proceedings
(1) The Tribunal may dismiss at any stage any proceedings before it in any of the following circumstances—
(a) if the applicant or appellant (or, if there is more than one applicant or appellant, each applicant or appellant) withdraws the application or appeal to which the proceedings relate,
(b) if the Tribunal considers that the proceedings are frivolous or vexatious or otherwise misconceived or lacking in substance,
(c) if the applicant or appellant (or, if there is more than one applicant or appellant, each applicant or appellant) has failed to appear in the proceedings,
(d) if the Tribunal considers that there…
Continue reading Lirantzis v Calligas
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Lirantzis v Calligas [2025] NSWCATCD 73
- Case
- [2025] NSWCATCD 73
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the second application for reinstatement was an abuse of process and whether there was any new material to justify the fresh consideration of the second application. The court found that the application for reinstatement was an abuse of process because it was the second such application. Furthermore, there was no new material presented that would warrant a fresh consideration of the application. Consequently, the court concluded that there was no basis for granting an extension of time for filing the second reinstatement application.
The court dismissed the second reinstatement application filed by Lirantzis. The court dispensed with a hearing for the application filed on 11 August 2025 and refused an extension of time to file the application. The court also dismissed the reinstatement application on the basis that it was an abuse of process and there was no new material to justify the fresh consideration of the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) A hearing of the applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
(2) An extension of time to file the applicants’ reinstatement application is refused.
(3) The applicants’ reinstatement application filed on 11 August 2025 is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.