| [2024] FWCA 4665 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
LINX Cargo Care Pty Ltd T/A LINX Cargo Care
(AG2024/4809)
LINX ADELAIDE/PORT PIRIE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025
| Stevedoring industry | |
| COMMISSIONER REDFORD | MELBOURNE, 24 DECEMBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the LINX Adelaide/Port Pirie Enterprise Agreement 2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the LINX Adelaide/Port Pirie Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Linx Cargo Care Pty Ltd T/A Linx Cargo Care (Linx). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Interaction with the National Employment Standards
Clause 9.3 of the Agreement provides that the National Employment Standards (NES) applies to employees covered by the agreement except where the agreement provides a more favourable outcome (NES precedence clause). On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement:
a.Clause 37.7 of the Agreement provides for compassionate leave, however it is silent in relation to the entitlement in circumstances when an employee, their spouse, or de facto partner has a miscarriage or gives birth to a stillborn child. Section 104(1)(c) of the Act provides for compassionate leave in these circumstances. On the basis of the NES precedence clause, the superior entitlement provided for in the NES will apply.
Consideration
Several matters were raised with Linx relating to whether each award covered employee, and each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee than if the relevant modern award applied to the employee. Taking into account the submissions made by Linx in response to those matters, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Maritime Union of Australia (Division of the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union) (MUA) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the MUA.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate 7 days after approval.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE527417 PR782821>
- AGLC
- LINX Cargo Care Pty Ltd T/A LINX Cargo Care [2024] FWCA 4665
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 4665
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Key issues included whether the agreement provided for minimum wages and conditions, whether it was free from prohibited content, and whether it allowed for appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The court also needed to consider if the process followed in obtaining employee approval was fair and in compliance with the Act.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was compliant with the statutory requirements. It provided for minimum wages and conditions, did not contain any prohibited content, and included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The process for obtaining employee approval was also deemed fair, as it involved a secret ballot conducted in a manner consistent with the Act. Consequently, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was successful.
The final orders of the Commission were that the LINX Adelaide/Port Pirie Enterprise Agreement 2025 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. This decision ensures that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement are legally binding on the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.