Linsket, B.T., matter of an application for an inquiry into an election in the F.C.U. of Australia

Case [1987] FCA 662


' P

' SIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

)

_

-

)

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

) NO. Q2 of 1986

1

INDUSTRIAL DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER Of an auullcation bv Barrv Trevor Lihsket for a'n inquiry into

an

election in

the

Federated

Clerks

Union

of

Australia

(R NO. 113 Of 1986)

AND IN

THE NATTER of a

reference

of

such

application

by

the

Industrial Registrar to the

Federal Court

of Australia

!

30 OCTOBER, 1987

KEELY J.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

On Tuesday, 1 3 October 1987, the court made certain

i

orders under S. 165(3)(d) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act

I

! '

1904 (the Act)

and reserved the delivery

of its reasons for making

those orders. Those reasons are

now given and are to be read

in

the light of the reasons for judgment delivered earlier

in this

matter (22 July 1987); the matters there

set out need not

be

,

repeated.

On 22 July 1987 the further hearing

of the matter was

adjourned at the request of all the partles in both this matter

and in matter No. Q3

of

1986. The two matters were closely

related and to some extent overlap although the Irregularity found

!

-

L

2.

'toyhave occurred in the present matter

was not a matter raised in

;Y

r

-3tter No. Q3 of 1986. In that matter orders were also made on

13

October 1987 and reasons for judgment

In it have been delivered

this day.

The orders made in the present matter were in the same

terms as those made in matter

No. Q3 of 1986, save that the

present orders related to only twelve of the thirty offices named

in the orders made in matter

No. Q3.

In

the

present

matter

the

Court

was not asked

to

exercise its discretion against making any orders. However,

on

other matters the submissions made were similar in both matters

-

in

particular as to

the

proposed

orders

under

S. 165(3)(d)

modifying the operation of the Branch Rules. Accordingly the

1.

present reasons should

be read

as if there were incorporated

in

them the relevant part of the reasons delivered today in matter

No. Q3 of 1986.

I certify that thls and the preceding page is a true copy of the Reasons f o r Judgment herein of the Honourable Mr. Justice Keelv.

Dated: 30 October,

1987

Details
AGLC
Linsket, B.T., matter of an application for an inquiry into an election in the F.C.U. of Australia [1987] FCA 662
Case
[1987] FCA 662
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Federal Court of Australia, Queensland District Registry, involves an application by Barry Trevor Linsket for an inquiry into an election within the Federated Clerks Union of Australia. The application was referenced by the Industrial Registrar to the Federal Court for decision. The court was tasked with determining whether there were grounds to order a re-election due to irregularities in the election process. The court also considered whether any modifications to the union's branch rules were necessary to prevent future irregularities.

The primary legal issue was whether the irregularities in the election process were significant enough to warrant a re-election. The court had to assess the nature and extent of the irregularities and whether they had materially affected the outcome of the election. Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriate remedial action under section 165(3)(d) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, including whether to modify the union's branch rules to prevent recurrence of similar issues.

In delivering the judgment, the court found that the irregularities in the election process were indeed significant and had materially affected the election outcome. The court was satisfied that a re-election was necessary to ensure the legitimacy and fairness of the union's leadership. The court also determined that modifying the union's branch rules was essential to prevent future irregularities. The court ordered a re-election for twelve of the thirty offices and made corresponding amendments to the union's branch rules to address the identified irregularities.

The court's final orders included the direction for a re-election of twelve union positions and modifications to the union's branch rules to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904. The orders were designed to rectify the irregularities and restore the integrity of the union's electoral process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.