Linsket, B.T., matter of an application for an inquiry into an election in the F.C.U. of Australia
[1987] FCA 662
•30 Oct 1987
' P
| ' SIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | ) |
| _ | - |
)
| QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY | ) NO. Q2 of 1986 |
| 1 | |
| INDUSTRIAL DIVISION | 1 |
IN THE MATTER Of an auullcation bv Barrv Trevor Lihsket for a'n inquiry into
| an | election in | the |
| Federated | Clerks | Union | of |
| Australia |
(R NO. 113 Of 1986)
| AND IN | THE NATTER of a |
| reference | of | such |
| application | by | the |
Industrial Registrar to the
| Federal Court | of Australia |
| ! | 30 OCTOBER, 1987 | KEELY J. |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On Tuesday, 1 3 October 1987, the court made certain
i
orders under S. 165(3)(d) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act
| I | ! ' |
| 1904 (the Act) | and reserved the delivery | of its reasons for making |
| those orders. Those reasons are | now given and are to be read | in |
| the light of the reasons for judgment delivered earlier | in this |
| matter (22 July 1987); the matters there | set out need not | be |
,
repeated.
| On 22 July 1987 the further hearing | of the matter was |
adjourned at the request of all the partles in both this matter
| and in matter No. Q3 | of | 1986. The two matters were closely |
related and to some extent overlap although the Irregularity found
!
| - | L | 2. |
| 'toyhave occurred in the present matter | was not a matter raised in |
| ;Y | r |
| -3tter No. Q3 of 1986. In that matter orders were also made on | 13 |
| October 1987 and reasons for judgment | In it have been delivered |
| this day. |
The orders made in the present matter were in the same
| terms as those made in matter | No. Q3 of 1986, save that the |
present orders related to only twelve of the thirty offices named
| in the orders made in matter | No. Q3. |
| In | the | present | matter | the | Court | was not asked | to |
| exercise its discretion against making any orders. However, | on |
| other matters the submissions made were similar in both matters | - |
| in | particular as to | the | proposed | orders | under | S. 165(3)(d) |
modifying the operation of the Branch Rules. Accordingly the
1.
| present reasons should | be read | as if there were incorporated | in |
them the relevant part of the reasons delivered today in matter
No. Q3 of 1986.
I certify that thls and the preceding page is a true copy of the Reasons f o r Judgment herein of the Honourable Mr. Justice Keelv.
| Dated: 30 October, | 1987 |
0
0
0