Linsket, B.T., matter of an application for an inquiry into an election in the F.C.U. of Australia

Case

[1987] FCA 662

30 Oct 1987

No judgment structure available for this case.

' P

' SIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

)

_

-

)

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

) NO. Q2 of 1986

1

INDUSTRIAL DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER Of an auullcation bv Barrv Trevor Lihsket for a'n inquiry into

an

election in

the

Federated

Clerks

Union

of

Australia

(R NO. 113 Of 1986)

AND IN

THE NATTER of a

reference

of

such

application

by

the

Industrial Registrar to the

Federal Court

of Australia

!

30 OCTOBER, 1987

KEELY J.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

On Tuesday, 1 3 October 1987, the court made certain

i

orders under S. 165(3)(d) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act

I

! '

1904 (the Act)

and reserved the delivery

of its reasons for making

those orders. Those reasons are

now given and are to be read

in

the light of the reasons for judgment delivered earlier

in this

matter (22 July 1987); the matters there

set out need not

be

,

repeated.

On 22 July 1987 the further hearing

of the matter was

adjourned at the request of all the partles in both this matter

and in matter No. Q3

of

1986. The two matters were closely

related and to some extent overlap although the Irregularity found

!

-

L

2.

'toyhave occurred in the present matter

was not a matter raised in

;Y

r

-3tter No. Q3 of 1986. In that matter orders were also made on

13

October 1987 and reasons for judgment

In it have been delivered

this day.

The orders made in the present matter were in the same

terms as those made in matter

No. Q3 of 1986, save that the

present orders related to only twelve of the thirty offices named

in the orders made in matter

No. Q3.

In

the

present

matter

the

Court

was not asked

to

exercise its discretion against making any orders. However,

on

other matters the submissions made were similar in both matters

-

in

particular as to

the

proposed

orders

under

S. 165(3)(d)

modifying the operation of the Branch Rules. Accordingly the

1.

present reasons should

be read

as if there were incorporated

in

them the relevant part of the reasons delivered today in matter

No. Q3 of 1986.

I certify that thls and the preceding page is a true copy of the Reasons f o r Judgment herein of the Honourable Mr. Justice Keelv.

Dated: 30 October,

1987

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0