Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd Trading AS Armaguard

Case [2025] FWCA 1734


[2025] FWCA 1734

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd Trading AS Armaguard

(AG2025/1453)

ARMAGUARD AND UNITED WORKERS UNION SECURITY SERVICES (AVALON) AGREEMENT 2025

Road transport industry

COMMISSIONER TRAN

MELBOURNE, 23 MAY 2025

Application for approval of the Armaguard and United Workers Union Security Services (Avalon) Agreement 2025

  1. Armaguard (ABN: 83 099 701 872) has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Armaguard and United Workers Union Security Services (Avalon) Agreement 2025 under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

  1. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I observe that the following clauses are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards:

    ·   Clause 33.5 (c) – Personal/Carers leave, regarding evidence requirements;

    ·   Clause 34.1 – Compassionate leave, regarding stillbirth and miscarriage;

    ·   Clause 46 – Abandonment of employment, regarding payment of notice of termination; and

    ·   Clause 38.3 – Redundancy, regarding applications under s 120 of the Act.

  1. Clause 5 of the Agreement gives precedence to the NES and I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. One of the undertakings relates to the removal of a sub-clause from the Consultation clause. I am of the view that I may accept that undertaking in accordance with s 190 of the Act. The undertaking removes an objectionable term, as clause 21.4 would otherwise permit a contravention of the general protections in Part 3-1 of the Act by precluding the exercise of a workplace right to consultation prior to a change being implemented because of that right.

  2. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The United Workers’ Union (UWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 30 May 2025.

  1. In accordance with clause 3, the nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 November 2027.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529130  PR787587>

APPENDIX A

Details
AGLC
Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd Trading AS Armaguard [2025] FWCA 1734
Case
[2025] FWCA 1734
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd, trading as Armaguard, sought approval from the Fair Work Commission for a new enterprise agreement with the United Workers Union Security Services (Avalon). The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for security officers under the proposed agreement. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement contained genuine bargaining, if it was in the best interests of the employees, and whether it complied with the good faith provisions of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement provided adequate protections and benefits for the employees, and whether it was free from coercion and undue influence.

In considering these issues, the Commission examined the bargaining process and the content of the agreement. The Commission found that genuine bargaining had taken place, and the agreement reflected the outcomes of this process. It was also determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, providing them with fair and reasonable terms of employment. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the good faith requirements of the Act and did not contain any terms that were unfair or unreasonable. Based on this analysis, the Commission approved the proposed agreement.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Armaguard and United Workers Union Security Services (Avalon) Agreement 2025, finding it to be a genuine product of bargaining, in the best interests of the employees, and compliant with the good faith provisions of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was thus approved and will govern the employment terms and conditions for the security officers involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.