| [2019] FWCA 7954 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2970)
ARMAGUARD CLERICAL QLD METROPOLITAN COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018
Security services | |
COMMISSIONER SPENCER | BRISBANE, 21 NOVEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Armaguard Clerical QLD Metropolitan Collective Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Armaguard Clerical QLD Metropolitan Collective Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[1] Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. An outstanding issue was in relation to casual loading being 1.5% lower under the Agreement than the Clerks Private Sector Award 2010 (the Award). I am satisfied that the higher base rate in the Agreement subsequently provides a higher loading than under the Award and remedies this concern.
[2] There has been an exchange of correspondence in relation to the overtime provisions for part time and casual employees. An example has been provided of the application of the provision and an undertaking as attached to the Agreement has resolved this concern.
[1] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from the employer. In accordance with ss.191(1) and 201(3) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement.
[2] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) and Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) being a bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers both organisations.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 November 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 May 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE506188 PR714502>
- AGLC
- Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 7954
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 7954
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the proposed collective agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including adequate minimum rates of pay, leave entitlements, and procedural fairness in the negotiation process. The FWC had to determine if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and if it complied with relevant industrial laws.
In reaching its decision, the FWC considered the evidence presented by both parties, including submissions on the bargaining process, the terms of the agreement, and the impact on employees. The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable, providing appropriate minimum rates of pay and leave entitlements. The FWC also noted that the negotiation process had been procedurally fair, with adequate opportunity for the unions to present their case. Based on these findings, the FWC approved the collective agreement, determining that it met the statutory requirements and was in the best interests of the employees.
The FWC's decision concluded that the Armaguard Clerical QLD Metropolitan Collective Agreement 2018 was approved under the Fair Work Act 2009. The FWC's approval was based on the agreement's compliance with the relevant industrial laws and its provision of fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.