DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd
(AG2016/5223)

ARMAGUARD AND TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION QUEENSLAND METROPOLITAN BRANCHES ROAD CREW AND ASSOCIATED AREAS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Road transport industry
COMMISSIONER SPENCER	BRISBANE, 1 SEPTEMBER 2016

Application for approval of the Armaguard and Transport Workers Union Queensland Metropolitan Branches Road Crew and Associated Areas Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Armaguard and Transport Workers Union Queensland Metropolitan Branches Road Crew and Associated Areas Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the agreement is approved, that is, 8 September 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd recently appeared before the Fair Work Commission to seek approval of the Armaguard and Transport Workers Union Queensland Metropolitan Branches Road Crew and Associated Areas Enterprise Agreement 2016. The applicant sought to have the enterprise agreement approved in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Union represented employees who were engaged in various roles within the applicant’s business, including security and transport services. The dispute centred on the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed enterprise agreement, particularly those relating to wages, hours of work, and other employment matters.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the enterprise agreement complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act and whether it met the 'better off overall test'. This test requires that the proposed agreement provides employees with conditions no less favourable than their previous conditions of employment or the applicable award. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement was fairly negotiated and whether it provided a safety net for employees by ensuring their terms and conditions were at least as good as those under the applicable award.

The Commission found that the application satisfied the procedural requirements and that the agreement had been fairly negotiated. The Commission considered the provisions of the agreement in light of the 'better off overall test' and concluded that employees would be better off with the proposed agreement than under the applicable award. The Commission took into account various factors, including wage increases, the preservation of certain entitlements, and improved working conditions. Ultimately, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, finding that it met the statutory requirements and provided a safety net for the employees.

The final orders of the Commission were that the Armaguard and Transport Workers Union Queensland Metropolitan Branches Road Crew and Associated Areas Enterprise Agreement 2016 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement was to commence on the date of the decision and would apply to the employees covered by the agreement. This decision provided certainty for both the applicant and the employees regarding their employment conditions moving forward.

Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established