Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWCA 4255


[2020] FWCA 4255
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd
(AG2020/2006)

LINEAGE AUS TRS PTY LTD CONVENIENCE & QSR TULLAMARINE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020

Storage services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT YOUNG

MELBOURNE, 12 AUGUST 2020

Application for approval of the Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd Convenience & QSR Tullamarine Enterprise Agreement 2020.

[1] Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd Convenience & QSR Tullamarine Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] One employee covered by the Agreement was issued with a copy of the Notice of Employee Representational Rights more than 14 days after the notification time, contrary to s 173(3) of the Act. The Employer provided submissions addressing the error on 7 August 2020. I am satisfied having regard to the Full Bench decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others 1(Huntsman)that this constitutes a minor technical or procedural error for the purposes s 188(2)(a) of the Act. Further, I am satisfied that employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error.

[3] Accordingly, notwithstanding the matters identified in paragraph [2] above, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s 188(2).

[4] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application, the accompanying statutory declaration and the additional information provided by the Employer, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6] I observe that clause 3.2.1 of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 1.5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[7] The United Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it seeks to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s 201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[8] The Agreement was approved on 12 August 2020 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 19 August 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE508723  PR721794>

Annexure A

 1   [2019] FWCFB 318

Details
AGLC
Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 4255
Case
[2020] FWCA 4255
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd for the approval of the Convenience & QSR Tullamarine Enterprise Agreement 2020. The dispute centred around whether the proposed enterprise agreement, which outlined terms and conditions for employees in the convenience and quick service retail sectors, complied with the necessary legal requirements and provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission was tasked with determining if the agreement met the criteria for being a "modern award" and if it provided fair and reasonable terms for employees.

The legal issues that arose in this case primarily revolved around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act, specifically sections concerning the approval of enterprise agreements. The Commission had to examine whether the agreement was made in good faith, if it provided for fair and reasonable terms for employees, and if it was made without any undue influence or coercion. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement was appropriately negotiated and if it complied with procedural requirements, such as the provision of necessary notices and the opportunity for employee representation.

In assessing these issues, the Fair Work Commission examined the evidence and submissions provided by both parties. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and without undue influence, and that it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and that all procedural requirements were met. Based on these findings, the Commission concluded that the Convenience & QSR Tullamarine Enterprise Agreement 2020 complied with the necessary legal requirements and provisions of the Fair Work Act.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Convenience & QSR Tullamarine Enterprise Agreement 2020, finding it to be a modern award that met all legal requirements and provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The Commission's decision was based on the evidence and submissions presented by both parties, and the agreement now serves as the governing document for the terms and conditions of employment for the employees within the scope of the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.