-
Haden Engineering Pty Ltd v McKinnon
[2010] VSCA 69
Citation 1
…least “very considerable”. Counsel relied upon the decision of Haden Engineering Pty Ltd v McKinnon .[9] He referred to paragraphs 11-13: [9] [2010] VSCA 69 “The evidentiary basis of the pain assessment will ordinarily comprise the following: (a) what the plaintiff says about the pain (both in court and to doctor…
-
Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v Kelso
[2010] VSCA 12
Citation 2
…nce of the disabling effect may be of less significance than usual.” [10] Dwyer (No 2) [2008] VSCA 260, [24]; Kelso [2010] VSCA 12, [48] [11] Sumbul [2006] VSCA 292, [13], [26], [33]–[34]; Stijepic [2009] VSCA 181, [48]; Sabo [2009] VSCA 242, [70]; Kelso at [50]–[55] [12] Sejranovic [2009] VSCA 108, [171] [13] Dw…
-
Sabo v George Weston Foods
[2009] VSCA 242
Citation 3
…gment.[8] [7] S.134AB(38)(j) of the Act [8] See Kelso v Tatiara Meat Company Pty Ltd [2007] 17 VR 592, at 628; Sabo v George Weston Foods [2009] VSCA 242, at paragraph [67]…
-
Stijepic v One Force Group Aust Pty Ltd
[2009] VSCA 181
Citation 4
(Para 42)
…es which do not end up in litigation – because, it may be supposed, the consequences are glaringly apparent one way or the other. … .”[5] [4] [2009] VSCA 181 [5] ibid at [42]…
-
Sabanovic v Atco Controls Pty Ltd
[2009] VSCA 143
Citation 5
(Para 8)
…so at [50]–[55] [12] Sejranovic [2009] VSCA 108, [171] [13] Dwyer (No 2) at [8]; Sejranovic at [171]; Sabanovic [2009] VSCA 143, [142]–[145] [14] Dwyer (No 2) at [8]; Sabanovic at [145] [15] Sabanovic at [142] [16] Dwyer (No 2) at [3] (per Nettle JA)…
-
Sejranovic v Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd
[2009] VSCA 108
Citation 6
(Para 50)
…[26], [33]–[34]; Stijepic [2009] VSCA 181, [48]; Sabo [2009] VSCA 242, [70]; Kelso at [50]–[55] [12] Sejranovic [2009] VSCA 108, [171] [13] Dwyer (No 2) at [8]; Sejranovic at [171]; Sabanovic [2009] VSCA 143, [142]–[145] [14] Dwyer (No 2) at [8]; Sabanovic at [145] [15] Sabanovic at [142] [16] Dwyer (No 2) at [3]…
-
Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2008] VSCA 260
Citation 7
…a case, the ‘objective’ evidence of the disabling effect may be of less significance than usual.” [10] Dwyer (No 2) [2008] VSCA 260, [24]; Kelso [2010] VSCA 12, [48] [11] Sumbul [2006] VSCA 292, [13], [26], [33]–[34]; Stijepic [2009] VSCA 181, [48]; Sabo [2009] VSCA 242, [70]; Kelso at [50]–[55] [12] Sejranovic [2…
-
Sumbul v Melbourne All Toya Wreckers Pty Ltd
[2006] VSCA 292
Citation 8
…e of less significance than usual.” [10] Dwyer (No 2) [2008] VSCA 260, [24]; Kelso [2010] VSCA 12, [48] [11] Sumbul [2006] VSCA 292, [13], [26], [33]–[34]; Stijepic [2009] VSCA 181, [48]; Sabo [2009] VSCA 242, [70]; Kelso at [50]–[55] [12] Sejranovic [2009] VSCA 108, [171] [13] Dwyer (No 2) at [8]; Sejranovic at […
-
Hunter v Transport Accident Commission
[2005] VSCA 1
Citation 9
…er s.134AB(38)(b) of the Act , the term “serious” is to be: [2] S.134AB(1) of the Act and Barwon Spinners Pty Ltd & Ors v Podolak (2005) 14 VR 622, at paragraph [11] [3] Barwon Spinners (ibid) at paragraph [33] “… satisfied by reference to the consequences to the worker of any impairment or loss of a body function…