Lindt & Sprungli (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case

[2013] FWCA 5427

8 AUGUST 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWCA 5427

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch 3, Item 15 - Application by agreement to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument

Lindt & Sprungli (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/7377)

LINDT AND SPRUNGLI AUSTRALIA EMPLOYER GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT CHADSTONE

Restaurants

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 8 AUGUST 2013

Application for termination of the Lindt and Sprungli Australia Employer Greenfields Agreement Chadstone.

[1] This is an application, filed by Lindt & Sprungli (Australia) Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) pursuant to Item 15, Sch 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consquential Amendments) Act 2009 (the ‘Transitional Act’) and s 222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) to terminate the Lindt and Sprungli Australia Employer Greenfields Agreement Chadstone [AC323657] (the ‘Agreement’). Relevantly, the Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 1 June 2010. The Agreement covers 17 employees at the applicant’s cafe in Chadstone, Victoria. The employees would otherwise be covered by the Restaurant Industry Award 2010 [MA000119] (the ‘Modern Award’).

[2] The relevant provisions of the Act governing this application are set out at ss 220-224 as follows:

    220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed termination of an enterprise agreement

    (1) An employer covered by an enterprise agreement may request the employees covered by the agreement to approve a proposed termination of the agreement by voting for it.

    (2) Before making the request, the employer must:

      (a) take all reasonable steps to notify the employees of the following:

        (i) the time and place at which the vote will occur;

        (ii) the voting method that will be used; and

      (b) give the employees a reasonable opportunity to decide whether they want to approve the proposed termination.

    (3) Without limiting subsection (1), the employer may request that the employees vote by ballot or by an electronic method.

    221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to

    Single-enterprise agreement

    (1) If the employees of an employer, or each employer, covered by a single-enterprise agreement have been asked to approve a proposed termination of the agreement under subsection 220(1), the termination is agreed to when a majority of the employees who cast a valid vote approve the termination.

    Multi-enterprise agreement

    (2) If the employees of each employer covered by a multi-enterprise agreement have been asked to approve a proposed termination of the agreement under subsection 220(1), the termination is agreed to when a majority of the employees of each individual employer who cast a valid vote have approved the termination.

    222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement

    Application for approval

    (1) If a termination of an enterprise agreement has been agreed to, a person covered by the agreement must apply to the FWC for approval of the termination.

    Material to accompany the application

    (2) The application must be accompanied by any declarations that are required by the procedural rules to accompany the application.

    When the application must be made

    (3) The application must be made:

      (a) within 14 days after the termination is agreed to; or

      (b) if in all the circumstances the FWC considers it fair to extend that period—within such further period as the FWC allows.

    223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:

      (a) the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and

      (b) the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and

      (c) the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and

      (d) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.

    224 When termination comes into operation

    If a termination of an enterprise agreement is approved under section 223, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to approve the termination.

[3] The application was supported by a statutory declaration of Ms F Behrens, Human Resources Manager of the applicant (s 222(2)). Ms Behrens said that the applicant operated seven other cafes in addition to the cafe at Chadstone. Employees at these cafes are covered by a combination of Employer Greenfields Agreements, Australian Workplace Agreements, Individual Transitional Employment Agreements and the Modern Award. Due to difficulties in administrating multiple industrial arrangements and the outdated nature of some of the instruments, the applicant was seeking to have all of its employees covered by the Modern Award.

[4] Further, Ms Behrens said that the applicant had met with all employees covered by the Agreement on 24 June 2013 and explained the reasons for application to terminate the instruments. Copies of the Modern Award were made available to the employees and they were provided with written confirmation of the meeting and given time to consider their vote. I am satisfied that the applicant gave the employees covered by the Agreement a reasonable opportunity to decide whether they agreed with the proposal to terminate the Agreement (s 220(2)). On 28 June 2013, 11 of the 15 employees who voted, agreed to terminate the Agreement, satisfying s 221(1) of the Act. The application was lodged on 3 July 2013, thus satisfying s 223(a) of the Act. For the sake of completeness, I am satisfied that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination (s 223(c)).

[5] At a hearing of the application (and other related applications) on 6 August 2013, Ms P Salewicz and Ms J van Bronswijk of the Australian Industry Group appeared with Ms F Behrens for the applicant. Ms Salewicz affirmed the content of Ms Behrens’ statutory declaration and said that there were some minor changes to the terms and conditions of the employees in being covered by the Modern Award in that it did not provide for blood donation or jury service leave, both of which are provided for in the Agreement. However, the applicant had agreed in writing to maintain any entitlements under the Agreement which are more beneficial than those under the Award.

[6] Having considered the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the application and the statutory declaration of Ms Behrens, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 220, 221, 222 and 223, have been met. Accordingly, the Lindt and Sprungli Australia Employer Greenfields Agreement Chadstone [AC323657] is terminated. Pursuant to s 224 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from 7 August 2013.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AC323657  PR539872>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0