Lindsey v Comcare

[2004] HCATrans 168

[2004] HCATrans 168

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Melbourne  No M278 of 2003

B e t w e e n -

DAVID JAMES LINDSEY (NOW KNOWN AS DAVID JAMES SJOSTROM-CLEMENS-LINDSEY)

Plaintiff

and

COMCARE

Defendant

For judgment

HAYNE J

(In Chambers)

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 27 MAY 2004, AT 9.32 AM

(Continued from 19/2/04)

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HIS HONOUR:   In my opinion there should be orders in this matter as follows:

1.        The plaintiff’s statement of claim is struck out.

2.        There should be judgment for the defendant in the action with costs including the costs of these applications and I would certify for the attendance of counsel in Chambers.  I publish my reasons.

The orders, accordingly, are:

1.        The plaintiff’s statement of claim is struck out.

2.        Judgment for the defendant in the action with costs, including the costs of these applications.

I certify for the attendance of counsel in chambers and I publish that order.

AT 9.32 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED