Lincoln v Holmesglen Institute of TAFE

Case [1999] FCA 603


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Lincoln v Holmesglen Institute of TAFE [1999] FCA 603

DISCRIMINATION LAW – application for enforcement of an interim determination of the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.

STANLEY PMHV FITZROY-MENDES AMARASURIYA ASIA ABRAHAM LINCOLN III v HOLMESGLEN INSTITUTE OF TAFE
V 52 of 1999

GOLDBERG J
5 MAY 1999
MELBOURNE


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V52 of 1999

BETWEEN:

STANLEY PMHV FITZROY-MENDES AMARASURIYA ASIA ABRAHAM LINCOLN III
Applicant

AND:

HOLMESGLEN INSTITUTE OF TAFE
Respondent

JUDGE:

GOLDBERG J

DATE OF ORDER:

5 MAY 1999

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

UPON the respondent by its counsel undertaking to the Court that it will comply with the interim order of President Alice Tay of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (“the Commission”) on 9 December 1998 that pending the resolution of the complaint before the Commission, it is to refrain from recording a fail mark against those subjects for which the applicant was enrolled in the second semester of 1998, until the removal of that interim determination or the resolution of the complaint by the applicant before the Commission or until further order of this Court.

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application filed 9 February 1999 is dismissed.  

2.        There be no order as to costs.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

V52 of 1999

BETWEEN:

STANLEY PMHV FITZROY-MENDES AMARASURIYA ASIA ABRAHAM LINCOLN III
Applicant

AND:

HOLMESGLEN INSTITUTE OF TAFE
Respondent

JUDGE:

GOLDBERG J

DATE:

5 MAY 1999

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (No 3)

  1. I have refused the applicant’s application to adjourn the hearing of the proceeding.  I have heard further submissions from the parties on the issue before the Court.

  2. Mr Niall, counsel for the respondent, has informed the Court that he has instructions on behalf of the respondent that it undertakes to the Court that it will comply with the interim order of President Alice Tay of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (“the Commission”) on 9 December 1998 that pending the resolution of the complaint before the Commission the respondent Holmesglen Institute of TAFE, is to refrain from recording a fail mark against those subjects for which the applicant was enrolled in the second semester of 1998, until the removal of that interim determination or the resolution of the complaint by the applicant before the Commission or until further order of this Court.

  3. On that basis for, the reasons referred to in my ruling on the application for an adjournment, the applicant effectively has the result he seeks in this Court.

  4. The undertaking on behalf of the respondent having been given to the Court the order of the Court is that the application filed 9 February 1999 is dismissed with no order as to costs.

I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Goldberg.

Associate:

Dated:             5 May 1999

Counsel for the Applicant: Applicant in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R M Niall
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
Date of Hearing: 5 May 1999
Date of Judgment: 5 May 1999
Details
AGLC
Lincoln v Holmesglen Institute of TAFE [1999] FCA 603
Case
[1999] FCA 603
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Lincoln sought judicial review of a decision by Holmesglen Institute of TAFE to terminate his enrolment. The Federal Court was called upon to determine the legality of the Institute's decision. The central issue was whether the Institute had breached its own rules and procedures in terminating Lincoln's enrolment, and whether the decision was made in accordance with applicable laws and principles of natural justice.

The court examined the Institute's internal policies and procedures, as well as the evidence presented by both parties. The court found that the Institute had followed its own rules and procedures in terminating Lincoln's enrolment, and that the decision was not made in breach of any legal principles. The court also found that Lincoln had been given an opportunity to present his case and respond to the allegations against him, and that the decision was not made without proper consideration of his case.

Accordingly, the court dismissed Lincoln's application for judicial review. The court found no error in the Institute's decision to terminate Lincoln's enrolment, and therefore there was no basis for granting the relief sought by Lincoln. The court made no order as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application filed 9 February 1999 is dismissed.

2. There be no order as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.