FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lincoln v Holmesglen Institute of TAFE [1999] FCA 603
DISCRIMINATION LAW – application for enforcement of an interim determination of the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.
STANLEY PMHV FITZROY-MENDES AMARASURIYA ASIA ABRAHAM LINCOLN III v HOLMESGLEN INSTITUTE OF TAFE
V 52 of 1999GOLDBERG J
5 MAY 1999
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
V52 of 1999
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PMHV FITZROY-MENDES AMARASURIYA ASIA ABRAHAM LINCOLN III
ApplicantAND:
HOLMESGLEN INSTITUTE OF TAFE
RespondentJUDGE:
GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER:
5 MAY 1999
WHERE MADE:
MELBOURNE
UPON the respondent by its counsel undertaking to the Court that it will comply with the interim order of President Alice Tay of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (“the Commission”) on 9 December 1998 that pending the resolution of the complaint before the Commission, it is to refrain from recording a fail mark against those subjects for which the applicant was enrolled in the second semester of 1998, until the removal of that interim determination or the resolution of the complaint by the applicant before the Commission or until further order of this Court.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application filed 9 February 1999 is dismissed.
2. There be no order as to costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
V52 of 1999
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PMHV FITZROY-MENDES AMARASURIYA ASIA ABRAHAM LINCOLN III
ApplicantAND:
HOLMESGLEN INSTITUTE OF TAFE
Respondent
JUDGE:
GOLDBERG J
DATE:
5 MAY 1999
PLACE:
MELBOURNE
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (No 3)
I have refused the applicant’s application to adjourn the hearing of the proceeding. I have heard further submissions from the parties on the issue before the Court.
Mr Niall, counsel for the respondent, has informed the Court that he has instructions on behalf of the respondent that it undertakes to the Court that it will comply with the interim order of President Alice Tay of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (“the Commission”) on 9 December 1998 that pending the resolution of the complaint before the Commission the respondent Holmesglen Institute of TAFE, is to refrain from recording a fail mark against those subjects for which the applicant was enrolled in the second semester of 1998, until the removal of that interim determination or the resolution of the complaint by the applicant before the Commission or until further order of this Court.
On that basis for, the reasons referred to in my ruling on the application for an adjournment, the applicant effectively has the result he seeks in this Court.
The undertaking on behalf of the respondent having been given to the Court the order of the Court is that the application filed 9 February 1999 is dismissed with no order as to costs.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Goldberg. Associate:
Dated: 5 May 1999
Counsel for the Applicant: Applicant in person Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R M Niall Solicitor for the Respondent: Mallesons Stephen Jaques Date of Hearing: 5 May 1999 Date of Judgment: 5 May 1999
- AGLC
- Lincoln v Holmesglen Institute of TAFE [1999] FCA 603
- Case
- [1999] FCA 603
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the Institute's internal policies and procedures, as well as the evidence presented by both parties. The court found that the Institute had followed its own rules and procedures in terminating Lincoln's enrolment, and that the decision was not made in breach of any legal principles. The court also found that Lincoln had been given an opportunity to present his case and respond to the allegations against him, and that the decision was not made without proper consideration of his case.
Accordingly, the court dismissed Lincoln's application for judicial review. The court found no error in the Institute's decision to terminate Lincoln's enrolment, and therefore there was no basis for granting the relief sought by Lincoln. The court made no order as to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application filed 9 February 1999 is dismissed.
2. There be no order as to costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.