Lin and Pyramid Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd
[2017] WASAT 5
•11 JANUARY 2017
LIN and PYRAMID CONSTRUCTIONS (WA) PTY LTD [2017] WASAT 5
| STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL | Citation No: | [2017] WASAT 5 | |
| BUILDING SERVICES (COMPLAINT RESOLUTION and ADMINISTRATION) ACT 2011 (WA) | |||
| Case No: | CC:522/2016 | 4 AND 5 OCTOBER 2016 | |
| Coram: | MR C RAYMOND (SENIOR SESSIONAL MEMBER) MR J FISHER (SENIOR SESSIONAL MEMBER) | 11/01/17 | |
| 4 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Proceedings dismissed | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | XI LIN PYRAMID CONSTRUCTIONS (WA) PTY LTD |
Catchwords: | Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 (WA) Complaints by individual lot owners in strata scheme and by strata company in respect of same alleged faulty and unsatisfactory regulated building services Whether applicant or strata company appropriate complainant |
Legislation: | Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 (WA), s 5(1), s 11(1)(d) Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA), s 17, s 33 |
Case References: | The Owners of Strata Plan 57895 and Pyramid Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd [2017] WASAT 4 |
Orders | 1. The proceedings are dismissed. |
Summary | The applicant was one of 10 lot owners in a strata scheme comprising 24 lots, who lodged complaints with the Building Commissioner under s 5(1) of the Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 (WA) against the respondent. The strata company had lodged identical complaints.,The Tribunal found in related proceedings, The Owners of Strata Plan 57895 and Pyramid Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd [2017] WASAT 4, that the strata company was entitled to advance the complaints made in these proceedings as relating to common property and consequently that the applicant was not entitled to advance the same claims which were accordingly dismissed. |
JURISDICTION : STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT : BUILDING SERVICES (COMPLAINT RESOLUTION and ADMINISTRATION) ACT 2011 (WA) CITATION : LIN and PYRAMID CONSTRUCTIONS (WA) PTY LTD [2017] WASAT 5 MEMBER : MR C RAYMOND (SENIOR SESSIONAL MEMBER)
- MR J FISHER (SENIOR SESSIONAL MEMBER)
- Applicant
AND
PYRAMID CONSTRUCTIONS (WA) PTY LTD
Respondent
Catchwords:
Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 (WA) Complaints by individual lot owners in strata scheme and by strata company in respect of same alleged faulty and unsatisfactory regulated building services Whether applicant or strata company appropriate complainant
Legislation:
Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 (WA), s 5(1), s 11(1)(d)
Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA), s 17, s 33
Result:
Proceedings dismissed
Summary of Tribunal's decision:
The applicant was one of 10 lot owners in a strata scheme comprising 24 lots, who lodged complaints with the Building Commissioner under s 5(1) of the Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 (WA) against the respondent. The strata company had lodged identical complaints.
The Tribunal found in related proceedings, The Owners of Strata Plan 57895 and Pyramid Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd [2017] WASAT 4,that the strata company was entitled to advance the complaints made in these proceedings as relating to common property and consequently that the applicant was not entitled to advance the same claims which were accordingly dismissed.
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
Applicant : No Appearance
Respondent : Mr R Shaw
Solicitors:
Applicant : N/A
Respondent : Lavan Legal
Case(s) referred to in decision(s):
The Owners of Strata Plan 57895 and Pyramid Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd [2017] WASAT 4
Introduction
1 The applicant, Mr Xi Lin, lodged a complaint with the Building Commissioner pursuant to s 5(1) of the Building Services (Complaint Resolution and Administration) Act 2011 (WA) (BSCRA Act) relating to a regulated building service provided by Pyramid Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd in the construction of a multistorey strata titled apartment building at 128 Brown Street, East Perth. The strata scheme is known as Urbano Uno. Mr Lin is the owner of strata Lot 2 being one of the apartments in the development which is described in strata plan 57895 registered on 27 January 2016. The strata company, incorporated on such registration occurring, being the Owners of Strata Plan 57895 (strata company), lodged a complaint with the Building Commissioner in respect of the same items of complaint and in respect of many other items of complaint.
2 It appears this complaint and complaints lodged by nine other lot owners completely overlapped the items of complaint made by the strata company to avoid the risk of any complaint item failing by reason of lack of standing. Under s 33 of the Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA) (ST Act) where the proprietors of lots the subject of a scheme are jointly entitled to take proceedings the strata company is expressly empowered to take the proceedings. The owners of such lots are entitled to jointly take proceedings in respect of the common property included within the scheme as common property is held by the proprietors as tenants in common in shares proportional to their unit entitlements (s 17 ST Act). On the other hand, a strata company has no standing to make a claim in respect of damage to a lot the title of which is held by the proprietor thereof.
3 All of these complaints were referred by the Building Commissioner to the Tribunal for determination pursuant to s 11(1)(d) of the BSCRA Act.
4 The 11 separate matters were listed for hearing over three days commencing on 4 October 2016. Due primarily to the extent of agreement reached by the expert witnesses in conferral prior to the hearing in accordance with the Tribunal's usual practices, the hearing was concluded in two days. The matters had not been consolidated. At the commencement of the hearing the Tribunal directed that the matters be heard together and that the evidence be evidence in all matters.
5 In the strata company proceedings, The Owners of Strata Plan 57895 and Pyramid Constructions (WA) Pty Ltd [2017] WASAT 4, the Tribunal dealt with all of the complaints duplicated in these proceedings relating to Lot 2 and we incorporate by reference the reasons for decision in that matter. The strata company has been ordered in those proceedings to give a copy of the Tribunal's reasons for decision to all applicants who have applied for orders in respect of the same items of complaint, within seven days of receipt of those reasons for decision.
6 The Tribunal found the strata company was entitled to a remedial work order in respect of one item of complaint, and gave leave for one other complaint to be withdrawn. The remaining items of complaint, save one, were dismissed. The exception related to complaint item 2.2 concerning cracks on the top of a corner window door between the dining room and balcony which the Tribunal held did not relate to common property and consequently that the claim could only be advanced by Mr Lin. However, the Tribunal found that the claim failed on its merits. As the Tribunal accepted that the strata company could advance all other claims as they related to common property it follows that Mr Lin is not entitled to do so in his own right and that all items of complaint raised by Mr Lin fall to be dismissed.
Order
The Tribunal will accordingly issue an order:
1. The proceedings are dismissed.
I certify that this and the preceding [6] paragraphs comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.
___________________________________
MR C RAYMOND, SENIOR SESSIONAL MEMBER
0
1
2