Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lim v Mosman Council [2017] NSWLEC 1253 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 May 2017 Date of orders: 17 May 2017 Decision date: 17 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Lim (Applicant)
Mosman Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr T To (Applicant)
Ms C McJannett
Mills Oakley Lawyers (Applicant)
Ms J Walsh
Pikes Verekers Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 25365/2017 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development application 8.2016.189.1 for substantial alterations and additions to existing dwelling house and associated landscape works at 5 Ryan Avenue, Mosman is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure “A” hereto.
…………….
Commissioner Morris
25365.17 Morris (s34 Annexure A conditions) (260 KB, pdf)
25365.17 Plans (19.7 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Lim v Mosman Council [2017] NSWLEC 1253
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1253
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the court needed to address were whether the council's decision was legally sound, and whether there was any procedural error in the decision-making process. The court also had to determine whether the council's decision was unreasonable and whether there was a failure to properly consider relevant statutory provisions. The court considered submissions from both parties, including evidence and arguments regarding the compliance with planning laws and the impact of the proposed development on the local community.
The court found that the council's decision was indeed legally sound and that no procedural errors had been committed. The court held that the council had properly interpreted and applied the relevant planning laws and had given adequate consideration to all relevant statutory provisions. The court found that the council's decision was not unreasonable and that there was no failure to consider any relevant factors. The court also found that the council had provided adequate reasons for its decision, which aligned with the statutory requirements.
As a result of the court's findings, the plaintiff's application for judicial review was dismissed. The council's decision to refuse the development application was upheld. No orders were made in favour of the plaintiff, and the council's decision remained in place.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.