LIESCHKE
v
LIESCHKE & ORS
[2024] HCASL 66
S147/2023
The applicant applies for an extension of time in which to seek special leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Leeming, Payne and Beech-Jones JJA) given on 13 October 2023.[1] The application involves no question of law and is not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
Special leave to appeal is refused with costs.
Gageler CJ
Gordon J
Edelman J
Steward J
Gleeson J
Jagot J
7 March 2024
- AGLC
- Lieschke v Lieschke & Ors [2024] HCASL 66
- Case
- [2024] HCASL 66
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to the High Court’s consideration were whether the application for an extension of time should be granted, and if the case presented a sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. The High Court noted that the application did not involve any question of law of general public importance and was not attended by sufficient doubt to justify the grant of special leave to appeal.
The High Court reasoned that the application for an extension of time would be futile if granted, given the absence of a substantial question of law or doubt regarding the correctness of the Court of Appeal’s decision. The Court observed that the applicant had not demonstrated any special circumstances warranting an extension. As a result, the application for special leave to appeal was refused, with the Court ordering the applicant to pay the costs of the application.
In summary, the High Court denied the applicant's request for an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal, concluding that such an extension would be futile given the lack of a substantial question of law or sufficient doubt regarding the appeal decision. The Court also ordered the applicant to pay the costs associated with the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.