Lewis v Lewis (No 2)

Case [2021] NSWCA 259


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Lewis v Lewis (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 259
Hearing dates: On the papers
Decision date: 26 October 2021
Before: Meagher JA, Leeming JA, Payne JA
Decision:

1.  Order that Peter’s costs of the appeal and cross-appeal be paid out of the estate of the late Pamela Lewis, on terms that upon payment the Administrator of the estate shall be subrogated to Peter’s entitlement under order 3 made on 6 August 2021.

2.  Order that Peter’s costs of the notice of motion filed on 20 August 2021 be included in Peter’s costs of the appeal.

Catchwords:

COSTS – supplementary order concerning costs – successful respondent sought further order entitling his costs in successful defence of appeal to be paid out of estate with administrator subrogated to respondent’s costs order – orders corresponded to form of orders made by trial judge which were unchallenged by appeal or cross-appeal – orders made

Legislation Cited:

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 36.16

Cases Cited:

Lewis v Lewis (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1519

Lewis v Lewis [2021] NSWCA 168

Category:Costs
Parties: David Grant Lewis (Appellant; Cross-respondent)
Peter Howarth Lewis (First Respondent; Cross-appellant)
Jeremy Neil Glass (Second Respondent, submitting)
Representation:

Counsel:
R Wilson SC (Appellant; Cross-respondent)
LJ Ellison SC (First Respondent; Cross-appellant)

Solicitors:
Walker & White (Appellant; Cross-respondent)
L Rundle & Co Solicitors (First Respondent; Cross-appellant)
File Number(s): 2020/00317667
Publication restriction: Nil
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity – Probate List
Citation:

[2020] NSWSC 1306

Date of Decision:
25 September 2020
Before:
Parker J
File Number(s):
2017/130576

Judgment

  1. THE COURT: On 6 August 2021, this Court gave judgment in Lewis v Lewis [2021] NSWCA 168 and made three orders:

“1. Appeal dismissed.

2. Cross-appeal dismissed.

3. The appellant David Lewis to pay the costs of the first respondent Peter Lewis of the appeal and cross-appeal.”

  1. By notice of motion filed on 20 August 2021, Peter seeks a further order as to costs, namely:

“order that the first respondent’s solicitor-client costs of the proceedings be paid out of the estate of the late Pamela Lewis, on terms that upon payment the Administrator of the estate shall be subrogated to the first respondent’s entitlement under order 3 and the payment charged against the appellant’s entitlement as a beneficiary of the estate of the late Pamela Lewis.”

  1. David opposes that order, although it is accepted that the application was made within the time specified by UCPR r 36.16. The parties have exchanged written submissions in accordance with a timetable directed by the Registrar, and have not sought for there to be an oral hearing. The second respondent has continued to take an inactive role in the appeal.

The parties’ submissions

  1. In support of the application, Peter points to a comparable order made by the primary judge on 29 October 2020 in Lewis v Lewis (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1519. His Honour had ordered that David pay…

Continue reading Lewis v Lewis (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Lewis v Lewis (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 259
Case
[2021] NSWCA 259
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Lewis v Lewis (No 2)*, the parties involved were Peter, the respondent, and the Administrator of the estate of the late Pamela Lewis. The dispute concerned an application for a supplementary order regarding costs following a successful defence of an appeal. The matter was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether to make a further order entitling the successful respondent's costs of the appeal to be paid out of the estate, with the administrator to be subrogated to the respondent's costs order. This was in addition to the costs orders already made by the trial judge, which had not been challenged on appeal.

The Court of Appeal reasoned that the proposed orders corresponded to the form of orders made by the trial judge, which had remained unchallenged. Applying this reasoning, the court ordered that Peter's costs of the appeal and cross-appeal be paid out of the estate of the late Pamela Lewis. The terms of this order stipulated that upon payment, the Administrator of the estate would be subrogated to Peter's entitlement under a previous order made on 6 August 2021. Furthermore, Peter's costs associated with a notice of motion filed on 20 August 2021 were to be included within his costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Order that Peter’s costs of the appeal and cross-appeal be paid out of the estate of the late Pamela Lewis, on terms that upon payment the Administrator of the estate shall be subrogated to Peter’s entitlement under order 3 made on 6 August 2021.

2. Order that Peter’s costs of the notice of motion filed on 20 August 2021 be included in Peter’s costs of the appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.