| CITATION: | Lewington v Lunt [2014] QCATA 341 |
| PARTIES: | Mr Johnathon Lewington (Applicant) |
| V | |
| Mr Kerry Lunt (Respondent) |
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | APL420 -13 |
| MATTER TYPE: | Appeals |
| HEARING DATE: | On the papers |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | Senior Member Stilgoe OAM |
| DELIVERED ON: | 19 December 2013 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
| ORDERS MADE: | 1. Leave to appeal refused |
| CATCHWORDS: | APPEAL – LEAVE TO APPEAL - MINOR CIVIL DISPUTE –where air conditioning not working for short period – where tenant refused to pay rent - where lessor issued notice to remedy breach and notice to leave – where tenant terminated tenancy early – whether lessor mitigated his loss Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld) ss 326(3) and 421(1)(b) Dearman v Dearman (1908) 7 CLR 549 Chambers v Jobling (1986) 7 NSWLR 1 QUYD Pty Ltd v Marvass Pty Ltd [2009] 1 Qd R 41 McIver Bulk Liquid Haulage Pty Ltd v Fruehauf Australia Pty Ltd [1989] 2 Qd R 577 |
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
The appeal tribunal heard and determined this matter on the papers in accordance with section 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.
REASONS FOR DECISION
In January 2013 Mr Lewington rented an apartment from Mr Lunt. He paid $930 per week rent for a “stylish, spacious and ultra-convenient…exclusive apartment” at Milton. He signed a 12-month agreement. In March 2013, the air-conditioner developed problems. It was not working for 24 days. A contractor carried out major repair work over 8 days, which made the master bedroom unliveable for that short time.
Mr Lewington stopped paying the rent in April 2013. Mr Lunt issued a notice to remedy breach and a notice to leave. Mr Lewington left the tenancy on 4 May 2013. Mr Lunt readvertised the apartment but, as at the date of hearing, he had not found new tenants. He applied for an order that Mr Lewington pay for the rent he lost by the early termination. The tribunal ordered Mr Lewington pay Mr Lunt $17,670 plus the filing fee.
Mr Lewington wants to appeal that decision. He says that the learned Adjudicator erred by failing to consider whether Mr Lunt had mitigated his loss or failed to take steps that could have avoided the loss. He says that the learned Adjudicator failed to consider the requirements of ss 326(3) and 421(1)(b) of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld). He says that the learned Adjudicator made findings of fact where there was no evidence to support the findings. He says the learned Adjudicator gave Mr Lunt compensation for a loss that had not yet occurred. He says the learned Adjudicator’s calculations are unclear or fatally flawed. He says that the learned Adjudicator erred in his calculation of the reduction in rent because the air conditioning…
Continue reading Lewington v Lunt
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Lewington v Lunt [2014] QCATA 341
- Case
- [2013] QCATA 341
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Leave to appeal refused
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.