Levy v Waverley Council

Case [2023] NSWLEC 1229


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Levy v Waverley Council [2023] NSWLEC 1229
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 March 2023
Date of orders: 16 May 2023
Decision date: 16 May 2023
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: O’Neill C
Decision:

The orders of the Court are:

(1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend the application, to rely on amended plans.

(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application, as agreed or assessed, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

(3) The appeal is upheld.

(4) Development Application No 144/2022 to demolish the existing buildings, construct a dual occupancy (attached), and strata subdivision into two lots, at 39 Glenayr Avenue, North Bondi, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – construction of a dual occupancy (attached) development – strata subdivision into two lots

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.15, 8.7

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34, 39

Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 4.4, 4.4A, 4.6

Cases Cited:

Cumming v Cumberland Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 117

Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90

Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118

RebelMH Neutral Bay Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWCA 130

Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Anne Levy (Applicant)
Waverley Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
J Palmer (Solicitor) (Applicant)
S Patterson (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/290842
Publication restriction: Nil

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No 144/2022, as amended, for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of two attached dual occupancy dwellings and strata subdivision (the proposal), at 39 Glenayr Avenue, North Bondi (the site), by Waverley Council (the Council).

  2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 16 March 2023. I presided over the conciliation conference. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties.

  3. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application.

  4. There are preconditions to the exercise of power to grant development consent for the proposal pursuant to cl…

Continue reading Levy v Waverley Council

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Levy v Waverley Council [2023] NSWLEC 1229
Case
[2023] NSWLEC 1229
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Levy v Waverley Council, the Applicant sought to amend a development application to demolish existing buildings and construct a dual occupancy with a strata subdivision. The Respondent, Waverley Council, opposed the application. The dispute was heard by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The Applicant argued that the amendment of the development application should be allowed, while the Council opposed the amendment on various grounds, including the impact on neighbouring properties and compliance with planning controls.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Applicant should be granted leave to amend the development application and whether the amended application should be granted consent. The court considered the criteria for granting leave to amend an application under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the merits of the amended application against the relevant planning policies and controls. The court also considered the impact of the amendment on neighbouring properties and whether the amendment would result in a development that was substantially the same as that previously approved.

The court found that the Applicant was entitled to amend the development application and that the amended application should be granted consent. The court held that the amendment did not result in a substantially different development and was in accordance with the relevant planning policies and controls. The court also found that the impact on neighbouring properties was not significant enough to warrant refusal of the amended application. The appeal was upheld, and the development application was granted consent subject to the conditions of consent set out in Annexure A. The Applicant was ordered to pay the Council’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

The orders of the Court are:

(1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend the application, to rely on amended plans.

(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application, as agreed or assessed, pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

(3) The appeal is upheld.

(4) Development Application No 144/2022 to demolish the existing buildings, construct a dual occupancy (attached), and strata subdivision into two lots, at 39 Glenayr Avenue, North Bondi, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.