New South Wales
Court of Appeal
CITATION: Leveraged Equities Pty Ltd v Huxley [2010] NSWCA 179 HEARING DATE(S): 19 July 2010
JUDGMENT DATE:
19 July 2010JUDGMENT OF: Allsop ACJ at 1; Macfarlan JA at 18; Handley AJA at 19 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 19 July 2010 DECISION: 2008/281448 (the application for leave to appeal and appeal from equity suit 5497/2008)
1. Application for leave to appeal granted.
2. The notice of appeal to be filed within 14 days.
3. Appeal allowed.
4. Judgment and orders made in the Equity Division on 21 September 2009 be set aside and in lieu therefore it be ordered as follows:
(a) The appellant have leave to enforce the following arbitral awards made in its favour against each of the first to fifth respondents in the same manner as a judgment or order of the Court:
(i) awards made in favour of the appellant against Gregory John Huxley in the amounts of $868,710.56 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $15,472.56 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008;
(ii) awards made in favour of the appellant against Prudence Anne Wilkinson in the amounts of $886,887.69 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $19,713.66 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008;
(iii) awards made in favour of the appellant against Jason Wilkinson in the amounts of $891,885.50 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $15,615.46 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008;
(iv) awards made in favour of the appellant against Jeffrey Douglas Dawson in the amounts of $367,292.62 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $14,192.66 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008; and
(v) awards made in favour of the appellant against Nicholas Edward Hamilton in the amounts of $84,774.89 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $14,925.50 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008.
(b) Judgment in favour of the appellant against Gregory John Huxley in the amount of $1,026,144.78 plus interest from 19 July 2010.
(c) Judgment in favour of the appellant against Prudence Anne Wilkinson in the amount of $1,052,096.16 plus interest from 19 July…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Leveraged Equities Pty Ltd v Huxley and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2010] NSWCA 179
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the phrase "first try to settle" in the dispute resolution clause of the agreements evinced an intention that any subsequent arbitral award would not be final and binding. The court was required to determine the construction of this clause and its effect on the finality of the arbitral awards.
The Court of Appeal reasoned that the phrase "first try to settle" did not express a clear intention that an arbitral award would not be final and binding. The court held that such a clause typically indicates a procedural step to encourage amicable resolution before resorting to formal dispute resolution, but it does not negate the binding nature of an award once it has been made. The court applied principles of contractual construction, emphasizing that for an award to be rendered non-binding, the intention to that effect must be clearly and unequivocally expressed.
The appeal was allowed, and the previous judgments and orders of the Equity Division were set aside. The Court of Appeal ordered that the appellant have leave to enforce the arbitral awards against each of the respondents as if they were judgments of the court, specifying the amounts awarded and the applicable interest. The respondents were ordered to pay the appellant's costs of the application and the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
2008/281448 (the application for leave to appeal and appeal from equity suit 5497/2008)
1. Application for leave to appeal granted.
2. The notice of appeal to be filed within 14 days.
3. Appeal allowed.
4. Judgment and orders made in the Equity Division on 21 September 2009 be set aside and in lieu therefore it be ordered as follows:
(a) The appellant have leave to enforce the following arbitral awards made in its favour against each of the first to fifth respondents in the same manner as a judgment or order of the Court:
(i) awards made in favour of the appellant against Gregory John Huxley in the amounts of $868,710.56 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $15,472.56 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008;
(ii) awards made in favour of the appellant against Prudence Anne Wilkinson in the amounts of $886,887.69 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $19,713.66 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008;
(iii) awards made in favour of the appellant against Jason Wilkinson in the amounts of $891,885.50 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $15,615.46 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008;
(iv) awards made in favour of the appellant against Jeffrey Douglas Dawson in the amounts of $367,292.62 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $14,192.66 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008; and
(v) awards made in favour of the appellant against Nicholas Edward Hamilton in the amounts of $84,774.89 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 18 August 2008 and $14,925.50 plus interest at the rate payable on a judgment debt of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 13 October 2008.
(b) Judgment in favour of the appellant against Gregory John Huxley in the amount of $1,026,144.78 plus interest from 19 July 2010.
(c) Judgment in favour of the appellant against Prudence Anne Wilkinson in the amount of $1,052,096.16 plus interest from 19 July 2010.
(d) Judgment in favour of the appellant against Jason Wilkinson in the amount of $1,053,211.03 plus interest from 19 July 2010.
(e) Judgment in favour of the appellant against Jeffrey Douglas Dawson in the amount of $442,605.97 plus interest from 19 July 2010.
(f) Judgment in favour of the appellant against Nicholas Edward Hamilton in the amount of $115,481.09 plus interest from 19 July 2010.
5. The respondents pay the appellant’s costs of this application for leave to appeal and appeal and at first instance.
6. The respondents to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if otherwise qualified for the costs of the appeal.
2008/279972 (the appeal from equity suit 4032/2008)
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Judgment and orders made in the Equity Division on 21 September 2009 be set aside and in lieu thereof dismiss the summons 4032/2008.
3. The respondents pay the appellant’s costs of this appeal and at first instance.
4. The respondents to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise qualified for the costs of the appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.