Leonne Velickovic (WC98/27)/Western Australia/Alan John Foxton
[2000] NNTTA 361
•27 November 2000
| NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL |
Leonne Velickovic (WC98/27)/Western Australia/Alan John Foxton, [2000] NNTTA 361 (27 November 2000)
| Application No: WO00/388 |
| IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) |
| - and - |
| IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into an expedited procedure objection application |
| Leonne Velickovic (WC98/27) (native title party) |
| - and - |
| The State of Western Australia (Government party) |
| - and - |
| Alan John Foxton (grantee party) |
| DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATION |
Tribunal: The Hon C. J. Sumner
Place: Perth
Date: 27 November 2000
Catchwords: Native title – future act –proposed grant of prospecting licence – expedited procedure objection application – Government party satisfied that there is no future act because native title is extinguished – Government party makes the grant – Tribunal has no jurisdiction – objection application dismissed.
Legislation:Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 148(a)
Cases:David Daniel & Ors (Ngarluma and Yindjibarndi people)/Western Australia/Raymond Butler and Stanley McDonald, NNTT WO99/197, Hon CJ Sumner, 11 August 2000
REASONS FOR DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATION
Background
On 31 May 2000, the Government party gave notice of its intention to grant prospecting licence 16/2068 to Alan John Foxton (‘the grantee party’) and included in the notice a statement that it considered that the grant attracted the expedited procedure. On 7 June 2000 Leonne Velickovic (WC98/27) (‘the native title party’) made an expedited procedure objection application to the Tribunal.
On 20 November 2000, the Department of Minerals and Energy advised the Tribunal and other parties that the Government party had granted the tenement on 31 October 2000 on the basis that, consistent with the findings of the Full Federal Court in Western Australia v Ward [2000] FCA 191; (2000) 170 ALR 159, native title had been extinguished.
The question of whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to conduct an inquiry where the Government party has granted a mining tenement in these circumstances was determined in David Daniel & Ors (Ngarluma and Yindjibarndi people)/Western Australia/Raymond Butler and Stanley MacDonald, NNTT WO99/197, Hon CJ Sumner, 11 August 2000. In that matter I decided that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to conduct a right to negotiate inquiry after the Government party has granted the tenement and that an application should be dismissed pursuant to s 148(a) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) if the tenement is granted.
Decision
The Government party has granted prospecting licence 16/2068 and accordingly the objection application is dismissed pursuant to s 148(a) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (as amended).
Hon C. J. Sumner
Deputy President
27 November 2000
0
1
0