Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v City of Swan & Ors [2010] HCATrans 88
[2010] HCATrans 88
[[2010] HCATrans 088
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S1 of 2010
B e t w e e n -
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC
Appellant
and
CITY OF SWAN
First Respondent
PARKES SHIRE COUNCIL
Second Respondent
WINGECARRIBEE SHIRE COUNCIL
Third Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS AUSTRALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT)
Fourth Respondent
NEIL SINGLETON
Fifth Respondent
STEPHEN PARBERY
Sixth Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS ASIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Seventh Respondent
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S362 of 2009
B e t w e e n -
LEHMAN BROTHERS ASIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Appellant
and
CITY OF SWAN
First Respondent
PARKES SHIRE COUNCIL
Second Respondent
WINGECARRIBEE SHIRE COUNCIL
Third Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS AUSTRALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT)
Fourth Respondent
NEIL SINGLETON
Fifth Respondent
STEPHEN PARBERY
Sixth Respondent
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC
Seventh Respondent
Publication of Reasons
FRENCH CJ
GUMMOW J
HAYNE J
HEYDON J
KIEFEL J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 30 MARCH 2010, AT 10.18 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
__________________
FRENCH CJ: These appeals from the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia were heard on 9 and 10 February 2010 by a court constituted by Justices Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Kiefel and myself. On 30 March 2010 the Court pronounced orders dismissing the appeals. I now publish the joint reasons of Justices Gummow, Hayne, Kiefel and myself.
HEYDON J: I supported the dismissal of the appeals, but I disagree with the costs order. I publish my reasons.
AT 10.20 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Insolvency
-
Commercial Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Res Judicata
0
0
0